Literature DB >> 8343712

The Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer. Don't condemn it without proper evidence.

D Churchill, M Beevers, D G Beevers.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8343712      PMCID: PMC1693511          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6896.123-c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


× No keyword cloud information.
  6 in total

1.  Inaccuracy of the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  E O'Brien; F Mee; N Atkins; K O'Malley
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1990-12-15       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Evaluation of performance of selected devices for measuring blood pressure.

Authors:  D R Labarthe; C M Hawkins; R D Remington
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1973-09-20       Impact factor: 2.778

3.  Experience with the random-zero sphygmomanometer.

Authors:  J G Evans; I A Prior
Journal:  Br J Prev Soc Med       Date:  1970-02

4.  A comparison of the random-zero and standard mercury sphygmomanometers.

Authors:  D Parker; K Liu; A R Dyer; D Giumetti; Y L Liao; J Stamler
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 10.190

5.  Measurement error in the Hawksley random zero sphygmomanometer: what damage has been done and what can we learn?

Authors:  R M Conroy; E O'Brien; K O'Malley; N Atkins
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-15

6.  The random-zero versus the standard mercury sphygmomanometer: a systematic blood pressure difference.

Authors:  R de Gaudemaris; A R Folsom; R J Prineas; R V Luepker
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 4.897

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.