Literature DB >> 8342899

Response time and reliability of three neonatal patient-triggered ventilators.

G Bernstein1, J P Cleary, G P Heldt, J F Rosas, L D Schellenberg, F L Mannino.   

Abstract

We studied the response time (RT) and reliability of three neonatal patient-triggered ventilator (PTV) systems: the Draeger Babylog 8000, the Bear Cub enhancement module (CEM), and the Infrasonics Star Sync. In 10 adult rabbits, airway flow and pressure recordings showed the RT of the Star Sync to be shorter than that of the Bear CEM (53 +/- 13 versus 65 +/- 15 ms, p < 0.05), and both were shorter than that of the Babylog (95 +/- 24 ms, p < 0.01) by ANOVA. The RT of the Bear CEM and the Babylog increased significantly at decreased trigger sensitivity settings. All ventilators triggered successfully on assist-control (A/C). However, the Babylog had a higher rate of asynchrony on SIMV (30 +/- 25%) than the Bear CEM (1.1 +/- 0.3%) and the Star Sync (1.2 +/- 0.4%), p < 0.01. In 10 infants with respiratory failure, recordings of airway flow and pressure were made at ventilator inspiratory time (Ti) settings of 0.3, 0.4, and 0.5 s on assist-control and on SIMV at rates of 15, 30, 45, and 60 breaths/min. The Star Sync and Bear CEM triggered successfully on A/C (100%) and had low rates of asynchrony on SIMV (1 to 3%). The Babylog had a lower success rate on A/C (70 +/- 12%) and a higher rate of asynchrony on SIMV (29 +/- 30%) than the other two ventilators; p < 0.01. The lower reliability of the Babylog was due to its variable refractory period (0.2 to 0.5 s, to equal the set Ti).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8342899     DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.2.358

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Rev Respir Dis        ISSN: 0003-0805


  8 in total

1.  International randomised controlled trial of patient triggered ventilation in neonatal respiratory distress syndrome.

Authors:  J H Baumer
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 5.747

2.  Evaluation of Ultrasound-Based Sensor to Monitor Respiratory and Nonrespiratory Movement and Timing in Infants.

Authors:  Gregory P Heldt; Raymond J Ward
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 3.  Neonatal nasal intermittent positive pressure ventilation: what do we know in 2007?

Authors:  Louise S Owen; Colin J Morley; Peter G Davis
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.747

4.  Effects of different triggering systems and external PEEP on trigger capability of the ventilator.

Authors:  Y A Konyukov; N Kuwayama; T Fukuoka; T Takahashi; T Mayumi; T Hotta; J Takezawa
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 17.440

Review 5.  Advances in neonatal conventional ventilation.

Authors:  S K Sinha; S M Donn
Journal:  Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 5.747

6.  Advances in respiratory support for high risk newborn infants.

Authors:  Eduardo Bancalari; Nelson Claure
Journal:  Matern Health Neonatol Perinatol       Date:  2015-05-21

7.  Feasibility and physiological effects of noninvasive neurally adjusted ventilatory assist in preterm infants.

Authors:  Christopher K Gibu; Phillip Y Cheng; Raymond J Ward; Benjamin Castro; Gregory P Heldt
Journal:  Pediatr Res       Date:  2017-07-12       Impact factor: 3.756

Review 8.  Synchronized mechanical ventilation for respiratory support in newborn infants.

Authors:  Anne Greenough; Thomas E Rossor; Adesh Sundaresan; Vadivelam Murthy; Anthony D Milner
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-09-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.