Literature DB >> 8341743

Osseointegrated implants: a comparative study of bone thickness in four vascularized bone flaps.

J L Frodel1, G F Funk, D T Capper, K L Fridrich, J R Blumer, J R Haller, H T Hoffman.   

Abstract

Primary and secondary reconstruction of mandibular continuity defects with vascularized bone is currently the standard of care at many institutions. The most commonly utilized donor sites for such bone flaps include the scapula, iliac crest, fibula, and radius. Recently, interest has grown in the placement of osseointegrated implants into these flaps to facilitate functional dental rehabilitation. There are no studies comparing the bone available from each of these flaps into which osseointegrated implants can be placed. In this cadaver study, the dimensions of bone available for implant placement from the iliac crest, scapula, fibula, and radius osseous flaps were measured. The iliac crest and fibula flaps had bone dimensions consistently adequate for implant placement. Bone available for the safe placement of implants into the scapula flap was found in the majority of specimens. The radius flap group had the highest number of specimens that were inadequate for implant placement. The majority of the specimens with bone inadequate for implantation were from females. Clinical implications of this study regarding flap selection are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8341743

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  17 in total

Review 1.  Mandibular Reconstruction: Overview.

Authors:  Batchu Pavan Kumar; V Venkatesh; K A Jeevan Kumar; B Yashwanth Yadav; S Ram Mohan
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2015-04-19

2.  Application of skeletal buttress analogy in composite facial reconstruction.

Authors:  Rachel Bluebond-Langner; Eduardo D Rodriguez
Journal:  Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr       Date:  2009-03

Review 3.  Choice of osseous and osteocutaneous flaps for mandibular reconstruction.

Authors:  Akihiko Takushima; Kiyonori Harii; Hirotaka Asato; Akira Momosawa; Mutsumi Okazaki; Takashi Nakatsuka
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Reconstruction of mandibular defects.

Authors:  Harvey Chim; Christopher J Salgado; Samir Mardini; Hung-Chi Chen
Journal:  Semin Plast Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 2.314

Review 5.  Oral rehabilitation of the cancer patient: A formidable challenge.

Authors:  Ivana Petrovic; Evan B Rosen; Evan Matros; Joseph M Huryn; Jatin P Shah
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.454

6.  Versatility of Fibula Free Flap in Reconstruction of Facial Defects: A Center Study.

Authors:  Sunil S Shroff; Sanjiv C Nair; Anjan Shah; Balasubramanya Kumar
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-06-09

7.  Analysis of the compatibility of dental implant systems in fibula free flap reconstruction.

Authors:  Ramin Carbiner; Waseem Jerjes; Kaveh Shakib; Peter V Giannoudis; Colin Hopper
Journal:  Head Neck Oncol       Date:  2012-06-21

8.  Maxillary reconstruction: Current concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Subramania Iyer; Krishnakumar Thankappan
Journal:  Indian J Plast Surg       Date:  2014-01

9.  Predictable dental rehabilitation in maxillomandibular reconstruction with free flaps. The role of implant guided surgery.

Authors:  José-Luis Cebrian-Carretero; Jorge Guiñales-Díaz de Cevallos; José-Andrés Sobrino; Tomás Yu; Miguel Burgueño-García
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2014-11-01

10.  Three-dimensional finite element analysis of implant-supported crown in fibula bone model.

Authors:  Young-Seok Park; Ho-Beom Kwon
Journal:  J Adv Prosthodont       Date:  2013-08-31       Impact factor: 1.904

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.