Literature DB >> 8339762

Changes in dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class III children treated by a modified maxillary protraction headgear and a chin cup: a longitudinal cephalometric appraisal.

K Takada1, S Petdachai, M Sakuda.   

Abstract

The purpose of the current report was to investigate cephalometrically possible orthopaedic effects of a modified maxillary protraction headgear (MPH) on dentofacial morphology in skeletal Class III female patients before and during the pubertal growth spurt period. Sixty-one patients were divided into three groups, the prepubertal (7-10 years, n = 20), the mid-pubertal (10-12 years, n = 22), and the late pubertal (12-15 years, n = 19) groups. Longitudinal record sets of subjects with acceptable good occlusion were used as the control. Patients were treated by protracting from the upper canine area. The mean ages at completion of the MPH treatment were 8.9, 11.3, and 13.3 years for the three test groups, respectively. The average treatment time was 1.1, 1.0, and 1.4 years for each of these groups. Lateral cephalograms at the start and completion of use of the MPH were collected. Annual differences were calculated from these paired records for each of 21 dentoskeletal variables in the test groups and compared to those of the control group. The pre- and mid-pubertal groups revealed significant increases in both the SNA (P < 0.01 and P < 0.001) and the maxillary length (Ptm-A/PP, P < 0.01), while the late pubertal group showed a less significant increase in the SNA (P < 0.05) alone. The decreased SNB, increased ANB and SNMP of the pre- and mid-pubertal groups was accounted for by the backward and downward rotation of the mandible. The results suggest possible orthopaedic effects of the MPH on dentofacial morphology in young females when it is applied before or during acceleration of the pubertal growth spurt.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8339762     DOI: 10.1093/ejo/15.3.211

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Orthod        ISSN: 0141-5387            Impact factor:   3.075


  20 in total

1.  Three-dimensional assessment of maxillary changes associated with bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Tung Nguyen; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie A Cornelis; Gavin Heymann; Leonardo K de Paula; Hugo De Clerck
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 2.650

2.  Three-dimensional analysis of maxillary protraction with intermaxillary elastics to miniplates.

Authors:  Gavin C Heymann; Lucia Cevidanes; Marie Cornelis; Hugo J De Clerck; J F Camilla Tulloch
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Comparison of short-term effects between face mask and skeletal anchorage therapy with intermaxillary elastics in patients with maxillary retrognathia.

Authors:  Cahide Ağlarcı; Elçin Esenlik; Yavuz Fındık
Journal:  Eur J Orthod       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  [Meta-analysis of the efficacy of bone anchorage and maxillary facemask protraction devices in treating skeletal class Ⅲ malocclusion in adolescents].

Authors:  Hui Shi; Hong-Shan Ge; Lu-Yi Chen; Zhi-Hua Li
Journal:  Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi       Date:  2020-02-01

5.  Skeletal changes of maxillary protraction without rapid maxillary expansion.

Authors:  Dong-Yul Lee; Eun-Soo Kim; Yong-Kyu Lim; Sug-Joon Ahn
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.079

6.  Success rate of miniplate anchorage for bone anchored maxillary protraction.

Authors:  Eline E B De Clerck; Gwen R J Swennen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Effects of face mask treatment with and without rapid maxillary expansion in young adult subjects.

Authors:  Koray Halicioglu; Ibrahim Yavuz; Ismail Ceylan; Abdulvahit Erdem
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-14       Impact factor: 2.079

8.  Treatment of maxillary deficiency by miniplates: a case report.

Authors:  Rahman Showkatbakhsh; Abdolreza Jamilian; Mohammad Behnaz
Journal:  ISRN Surg       Date:  2011-05-10

9.  Modified tandem traction bow appliance compared with facemask therapy in treating Class III malocclusions.

Authors:  Tuba Tortop; Emine Kaygisiz; Deniz Gencer; Sema Yuksel; Zeynep Atalay
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2013-11-25       Impact factor: 2.079

10.  Lower incisor position in different malocclusions and facial patterns.

Authors:  Estrella Hernández-Sayago; Eduardo Espinar-Escalona; Jose-Maria Barrera-Mora; Maria-Belen Ruiz-Navarro; Jose-Maria Llamas-Carreras; Enrique Solano-Reina
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2013-03-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.