Literature DB >> 8339691

Infants' ability to draw inferences about nonobvious object properties: evidence from exploratory play.

D A Baldwin1, E M Markman, R L Melartin.   

Abstract

Generalizing knowledge about nonobvious object properties often involves inductive inference. For example, having discovered that a particular object can float, we may infer that other objects of similar appearance likewise float. In this research, exploratory play served as a window on early inductive capability. In the first study, 48 infants between 9 and 16 months explored pairs of novel toys in 2 test conditions: violated expectation (two similar toys were presented in sequence, the first toy produced an interesting nonobvious property, such as a distinctive sound or movement, while the second toy was invisibly altered such that it failed to produce the nonobvious property available in the first toy), and interest control (two similar-looking toys were presented in sequence, neither of which produced the interesting property). Infants quickly and persistently attempted to reproduce the interesting property when exploring the second toy of the violated expectation condition relative to the first toy of the interest control condition (a baseline estimate) or the second toy of the interest control condition (an estimate of simple disinterest). The second study, with 40 9-16-months-olds, confirmed these results and also indicated a degree of discrimination on infants' part: Infants seldom expected toys of radically different appearance to possess the same nonobvious property. The findings indicate that infants as young as 9 months can draw simple inferences about nonobvious object properties after only brief experience with just 1 exemplar.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8339691

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  34 in total

Review 1.  Properties of inductive reasoning.

Authors:  E Heit
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

2.  Priming infants to attend to color and pattern information in an individuation task.

Authors:  Teresa Wilcox; Catherine Chapa
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004-01

3.  Young children's preference for unique owned objects.

Authors:  Susan A Gelman; Natalie S Davidson
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-07-07

4.  Event categorization in infancy.

Authors:  Renée Baillargeon; Su-Hua Wang
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2002-02-01       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  What's new? Children prefer novelty in referent selection.

Authors:  Jessica S Horst; Larissa K Samuelson; Sarah C Kucker; Bob McMurray
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2010-11-18

6.  Attributing false beliefs about non-obvious properties at 18 months.

Authors:  Rose M Scott; Renée Baillargeon; Hyun-joo Song; Alan M Leslie
Journal:  Cogn Psychol       Date:  2010-11-02       Impact factor: 3.468

Review 7.  Causal learning is collaborative: Examining explanation and exploration in social contexts.

Authors:  Cristine H Legare; David M Sobel; Maureen Callanan
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-10

8.  Rethinking Conceptually-Based Inference: Commentary on "Fifteen-month-old infants attend to shape over other perceptual properties in an induction task," by S. Graham and G. Diesendruck, and "Form follows function: Learning about function helps children learn about shape," by E. Ware & A. Booth.

Authors:  Larissa K Samuelson; Sammy Perone
Journal:  Cogn Dev       Date:  2010-04

9.  Infants consider both the sample and the sampling process in inductive generalization.

Authors:  Hyowon Gweon; Joshua B Tenenbaum; Laura E Schulz
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  On the other hand: Increased cortical activation to human versus mechanical hands in infants.

Authors:  Marisa Biondi; David A Boas; Teresa Wilcox
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.