Literature DB >> 8339577

Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurement of cardiac output in postaortocoronary bypass patients.

W S Sageman1, D E Amundson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the degree of correlation and agreement between cardiac output by thermodilution and bioimpedance using the BoMed NCCOM3-R7 monitor in postaortocoronary bypass patients.
DESIGN: Prospective, randomized sampling.
SETTING: Military teaching hospital intensive care unit. PATIENTS: Fifty patients undergoing coronary artery bypass surgery with thermodilution pulmonary artery catheters in place. Simultaneous determination of cardiac output by thermodilution and thoracic bioimpedance was performed. Readings were taken between 8 and 24 hrs after surgery. Forty patients were intubated; 19 patients had left-sided tube thoracotomy in addition to two mediastinal tubes, and 19 patients were obese.
INTERVENTIONS: None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The overall degree of correlation between the two measures was fair (r2 = .24). The bias and precision measurements were inaccurate as well (-0.33 +/- 3.14). Patients with normal body habitus or who were not receiving mechanical ventilation showed the best correlation (r2 = .40 and r2 = .45, respectively). Only 62% (31/50) of all patients had simultaneous measurements fall within 20% of each other, and there were no clinical features that made identification of those patients possible.
CONCLUSIONS: Use of the BoMed NCCOM3-R7 bioimpedance monitor as a replacement for thermodilution-derived cardiac output cannot be recommended in postaortocoronary bypass patients. The distortions of patients' normal anatomy and physiology, coupled with the presence of endotracheal tubes and mechanical ventilation, mediastinal tubes and chest tubes, result in only fair correlation, significant bias, and poor precision between the two measures of cardiac output.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8339577     DOI: 10.1097/00003246-199308000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Care Med        ISSN: 0090-3493            Impact factor:   7.598


  7 in total

1.  A meta-analysis of studies using bias and precision statistics to compare cardiac output measurement techniques.

Authors:  L A Critchley; J A Critchley
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  Descending aortic flow contribution to intrathoracic impedance-development and preliminary testing of a dual impedance model.

Authors:  A Barry Baker; Chris N McLeod; Alastair J Roxburgh; Paul Bannister
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2007-11-15       Impact factor: 2.502

3.  Comparison of impedance cardiography and dye dilution method for measuring cardiac output.

Authors:  W Spiering; P N van Es; P W de Leeuw
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1998-05       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution.

Authors:  Stefan Suttner; Thilo Schöllhorn; Joachim Boldt; Jochen Mayer; Kerstin D Röhm; Katrin Lang; Swen N Piper
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-10-13       Impact factor: 17.440

5.  Reliability of cardiac output calculation by the fick principle and central venous oxygen saturation in emergency conditions.

Authors:  Avi A Weinbroum; Philippe Biderman; Dror Soffer; Joseph M Klausner; Oded Szold
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 6.  Measuring impedance in congestive heart failure: current options and clinical applications.

Authors:  W H Wilson Tang; Wilson Tong
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2008-12-16       Impact factor: 4.749

7.  Lack of agreement between bioimpedance and continuous thermodilution measurement of cardiac output in intensive care unit patients.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 9.097

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.