Literature DB >> 8339425

Growth of the aortic anastomosis, annulus, and root after the arterial switch procedure performed in infancy.

M Hourihan1, S D Colan, G Wernovsky, U Maheswari, J E Mayer, S P Sanders.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: We investigated the size and growth potential of the neoaortic root and aortic anastomosis after the arterial switch operation (ASO) for D-transposition of the great arteries (D-TGA) performed in infants. Circumferential suture lines connecting the great arteries and extensive surgery on the arterial roots to transplant the coronary arteries are essential parts of the ASO. However, little is known about the growth of the aortic anastomosis, the neoaortic root, and the neoaortic annulus after the ASO performed in infancy. METHODS AND
RESULTS: Serial echocardiograms on 50 patients with D-TGA who underwent ASO in infancy at our institution were reviewed, and the size of the aortic anastomosis, the neoaortic root, and the neoaortic annulus were compared with similar structures in a group of 312 control subjects. Before surgery, the native pulmonary root (future neoaortic root) was 1.59 SD larger (P < .001) and the native pulmonary annulus (future neoaortic annulus) was 1.4 SD larger (P < .001) in infants with D-TGA than the aortic root and annulus of control patients. At a mean of 22 months (12 months to 6 1/2 years) after surgery, the diameter of the aorta at the anastomosis was 0.45 SD smaller than the ascending aorta of control subjects (P < .001). The neoaortic root was 2.9 SD larger (P < .001) and the neoaortic annulus was 1.6 SD larger (P < .001) than the comparable structures in the control population. Most important, growth of the aortic anastomosis was commensurate with somatic growth, but the dilation of the neoaortic root appeared to be progressive over time. The neoaortic root was significantly more dilated in patients with a history of pulmonary artery banding (P < .001) and in patients with neoaortic regurgitation (P < .001). The presence of a ventricular septal defect was not significantly related to postoperative neoaortic root size.
CONCLUSIONS: This study underlies the importance of continued acquisition and examination of the data regarding the long-term outcome of the arterial switch operation performed in infancy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8339425     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.88.2.615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  13 in total

1.  Follow-up outcomes 10 years after arterial switch operation for transposition of the great arteries: comparison of cardiological health status and health-related quality of life to those of the a normal reference population.

Authors:  Wilfred B de Koning; Magdalena van Osch-Gevers; A Derk Jan Ten Harkel; Ron T van Domburg; Alma W Spijkerboer; Elisabeth M W J Utens; Ad J J C Bogers; Willem A Helbing
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 3.183

Review 2.  Monitoring the patient with transposition of the great arteries: arterial switch versus atrial switch.

Authors:  Susan Lucy Roche; Candice Kristine Silversides; Erwin Notker Oechslin
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 2.931

3.  Impact of initial shunt type on cardiac size and function in children with single right ventricle anomalies before the Fontan procedure: the single ventricle reconstruction extension trial.

Authors:  Peter C Frommelt; Eric Gerstenberger; James F Cnota; Meryl S Cohen; Jessica Gorentz; Kevin D Hill; J Blaine John; Jami C Levine; Jimmy Lu; William T Mahle; Rachel T McCandless; Luc Mertens; Gail D Pearson; Carolyn Spencer; Deepika Thacker; Ismee A Williams; Pierre C Wong; Jane W Newburger
Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 24.094

4.  Does initial shunt type for the Norwood procedure affect echocardiographic measures of cardiac size and function during infancy?: the Single Vventricle Reconstruction trial.

Authors:  Peter C Frommelt; Lin T Guey; L LuAnn Minich; Majeed Bhat; Tim J Bradley; Steve D Colan; Greg Ensing; Jessica Gorentz; Haleh Heydarian; J Blaine John; Wyman W Lai; Jami C Levine; William T Mahle; Stephen G Miller; Richard G Ohye; Gail D Pearson; Girish S Shirali; Pierre C Wong; Meryl S Cohen
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-04-21       Impact factor: 29.690

5.  Great vessel root and artery dimensions in transposition of the great arteries repaired with atrial switch operation.

Authors:  Gregory K Yurasek; Kimberlee Gauvreau; Andrew J Powell; Tal Geva; David W Brown
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-10-06       Impact factor: 1.655

6.  Risk factors for neo-aortic root enlargement and aortic regurgitation following arterial switch operation.

Authors:  C J McMahon; W J Ravekes; E O'Brian Smith; S W Denfield; R H Pignatelli; C A Altman; N A Ayres
Journal:  Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.655

7.  Stenosis of the branches of the neopulmonary artery after the arterial switch operation: A cardiac magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  Boban Thomas; José Diogo Ferreira Martins; Nuno Jalles Tavares; Artur Lopes; Fátima F Pinto; José Fragata
Journal:  Ann Pediatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-01

8.  Role and effectiveness of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the diagnosis, preoperative evaluation and follow-up of patients with congenital heart diseases.

Authors:  L Lovato; A Giardini; C La Palombara; V Russo; V Gostoli; G Gargiulo; F M Picchio; R Fattori
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-07-23       Impact factor: 6.313

9.  Novel SMAD3 Mutation in a Patient with Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome with Significant Aortic Aneurysm.

Authors:  Kristi K Fitzgerald; Abdul Majeed Bhat; Katrina Conard; James Hyland; Christian Pizarro
Journal:  Case Rep Genet       Date:  2014-03-03

10.  Normal values for aortic diameters in children and adolescents--assessment in vivo by contrast-enhanced CMR-angiography.

Authors:  Thomas Kaiser; Christian J Kellenberger; Manuela Albisetti; Eva Bergsträsser; Emanuela R Valsangiacomo Buechel
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.