Literature DB >> 8338798

Disparity-tuned channels of the human visual system.

L K Cormack1, S B Stevenson, C M Schor.   

Abstract

Traditionally, it has been thought that the processing of binocular disparity for the perception of stereoscopic depth is accomplished via three types of disparity-selective channels--"near," "far," and "tuned." More recent evidence challenges this notion. We have derived disparity-tuning functions psychophysically using a subthreshold summation (i.e. low-level masking) technique. We measured correlation-detection thresholds for dynamic random-element stereograms containing either one or two surfaces in depth. The resulting disparity-tuning functions show an opponent-type profile, indicating the presence of inhibition between disparity-tuned units in the visual system. Moreover, there is clear inhibition between disparities of the same sign, obviating a strict adherence to near-far opponency. These results compare favorably with tuning functions derived psychophysically using an adaptation technique, and with the tuning profiles from published single-unit recordings. Our results suggests a continuum of overlapping disparity-tuned channels, which is consistent with recent physiological evidence as well as models based on other psychophysical data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8338798     DOI: 10.1017/s0952523800005290

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vis Neurosci        ISSN: 0952-5238            Impact factor:   3.241


  8 in total

1.  Long-distance interactions in Cyclopean vision.

Authors:  R P Kohly; D Regan
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2001-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Human vergence eye movements initiated by competing disparities: evidence for a winner-take-all mechanism.

Authors:  B M Sheliga; E J FitzGibbon; F A Miles
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  Adaptation to natural binocular disparities in primate V1 explained by a generalized energy model.

Authors:  Ralf M Haefner; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 17.173

4.  Adaptation changes stereoscopic depth selectivity in visual cortex.

Authors:  Thang Duong; Bartlett D Moore; Ralph D Freeman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2011-08-24       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Temporal integration differences between crossed and uncrossed stereoscopic mechanisms.

Authors:  R Patterson; R Cayko; G L Short; R Flanagan; L Moe; E Taylor; P Day
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-08

Review 6.  Binocular vision.

Authors:  Randolph Blake; Hugh Wilson
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2010-10-15       Impact factor: 1.886

7.  50 Years of Stereoblindness: Reconciliation of a Continuum of Disparity Detectors With Blindness for Disparity in Near or Far Depth.

Authors:  Reinder Dorman; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2017-11-16

Review 8.  Binocular fusion, suppression and diplopia for blurred edges.

Authors:  Mark A Georgeson; Stuart A Wallis
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.117

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.