Literature DB >> 8338293

An analysis of morning report: implications for internal medicine education.

N S Wenger1, R B Shpiner.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the initial diagnosis of cases presented at morning report with the final morning report diagnosis reached at discharge from the Medicine service and the diagnosis as evaluated 6 months after discharge.
DESIGN: Prospective cohort study of morning report cases.
SETTING: A university internal medicine residency program. MEASUREMENTS: Proportion of morning report cases in which the initial morning report diagnosis differed from the final morning report diagnosis at discharge or, in cases where a firm diagnosis was not reached at discharge, the proportion for which a diagnosis was established by 6 months after discharge. MAIN
RESULTS: In 24% of cases, a firm morning report diagnosis was not available at discharge. For 61% of these, a diagnosis could be established by 6-month follow-up: for 36% the diagnosis differed from the final morning report diagnosis; and for 25% it was the same. Among cases where a firm final diagnosis was reached during morning report, the initial morning report diagnosis differed for 17%.
CONCLUSIONS: Most patients discharged without a firm diagnosis have one established by 6 months later--often with surprising results. Postdischarge follow-up information could enhance the educational value of inpatient cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8338293     DOI: 10.7326/0003-4819-119-5-199309010-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-4819            Impact factor:   25.391


  8 in total

1.  Reforming internal medicine residency training. A report from the Society of General Internal Medicine's task force for residency reform.

Authors:  Eric S Holmboe; Judith L Bowen; Michael Green; Jessica Gregg; Lorenzo DiFrancesco; Eileen Reynolds; Patrick Alguire; David Battinelli; Catherine Lucey; Daniel Duffy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Decreased hospital length of stay associated with presentation of cases at morning report with librarian support.

Authors:  Daniel E Banks; Runhua Shi; Donna F Timm; Kerri Ann Christopher; David Charles Duggar; Marianne Comegys; Jerry McLarty
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2007-10

3.  Frequency and impact of housestaff contact with primary care physicians.

Authors:  M Ways; J Umali; D Buchwald
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 4.  Morning report and work rounds: opportunities for teaching and learning.

Authors:  F J Schiffman
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  1996

5.  Improving communication between housestaff and primary care physicians.

Authors:  J Morrison; J Aucott
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Determinants of case selection at morning report.

Authors:  B Ramratnam; G Kelly; A Mega; P Tilkemeier; F J Schiffman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Morning report: can an established medical education tradition be validated?

Authors:  Matthew McNeill; Sayed K Ali; Daniel E Banks; Ishak A Mansi
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2013-09

8.  Morning report revisited: a new model reflecting medical practice of the 1990s.

Authors:  S A Wartman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 5.128

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.