Literature DB >> 8334660

The Save our Sisters Project. A social network strategy for reaching rural black women.

E Eng1.   

Abstract

Why are older black women screened less for breast cancer? What can be done to narrow the racial gap in mammography screening? These are the questions addressed by the Save Our Sisters (SOS) Project, a pilot demonstration study funded by the National Cancer Institute in a rural county of North Carolina. The target population is 2600 black women 50-74 years of age residing in the county. To assist these women to obtain annual mammograms, SOS has recruited and trained 64 black women who are "natural helpers" to serve as lay health advisors. The lay health advisors reach older black women through their existing kin, friendship, and job networks. Responses from 14 focus group interviews found that when it is a matter of older black women's health concerns, women turn to certain women for social support. Responses revealed factors related to the individual woman and her social network that influence rural black women's seeking breast cancer screening. These results were applied to the Social Change model for designing the training and three network intervention strategies: (1) providing social support (information and referrals, emotional caring, and tangible assistance) through interpersonal counseling with women in their social networks; (2) working as a group, planning and implementing breast cancer control and prevention activities through community-based organizations to which advisors belong (e.g., church groups, civic groups, and social groups); and (3) establishing themselves as a non-profit, community-based SOS Association to sustain project interventions after the funding period. The SOS Community Advisory Group and the advisors developed innovative methods of recruitment, implementation, and follow-up. The community programs they have initiated are: (1) the Adopt-A-Sister Program, which assists black women who cannot afford the cost of a mammogram; (2) a committee on understanding the health care system, which assists women in negotiating regulations and using health care providers; (3) a training committee, which recruits and trains additional advisors; (4) a support group for black women with diagnoses of breast cancer; and (5) a speakers bureau, which has produced a 10-minute video, brochure, and tee-shirts as community education materials.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8334660     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19930801)72:3+<1071::aid-cncr2820721322>3.0.co;2-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  26 in total

1.  Low income, race, and the use of mammography.

Authors:  D M Makuc; N Breen; V Freid
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1999-04       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Increasing use of mammography among older, rural African American women: results from a community trial.

Authors:  Jo Anne Earp; Eugenia Eng; Michael S O'Malley; Mary Altpeter; Garth Rauscher; Linda Mayne; Holly F Mathews; Kathy S Lynch; Bahjat Qaqish
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  The effect of a church-based breast cancer screening education program on mammography rates among African-American women.

Authors:  Baqar A Husaini; Darren E Sherkat; Robert Levine; Richard Bragg; Cain A Van; Janice S Emerson; Christina M Mentes
Journal:  J Natl Med Assoc       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 1.798

4.  The SUCCEED Legacy Grant program: enhancing community capacity to implement evidence-based interventions in breast and cervical cancer.

Authors:  John Harvey Wingfield; Tabia Henry Akintobi; DeBran Jacobs; Marvella E Ford
Journal:  J Health Care Poor Underserved       Date:  2012-05

5.  Randomized trial of an intervention to improve mammography utilization among a triracial rural population of women.

Authors:  Electra Paskett; Cathy Tatum; Julia Rushing; Robert Michielutte; Ronny Bell; Kristie Long Foley; Marisa Bittoni; Stephanie L Dickinson; Ann Scheck McAlearney; Katherine Reeves
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2006-09-06       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Screening mammography and constructs from the transtheoretical model: Associations using two definitions of the stages-of-adoption.

Authors:  W Rakowski; B Ehrich; C E Dubé; D N Pearlman; M G Goldstein; K K Peterson; B K Rimer; H Woolverton
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996-06

7.  Training lay health workers to promote post-treatment breast cancer surveillance in African American breast cancer survivors: development and implementation of a curriculum.

Authors:  Hayley S Thompson; Tiffany Edwards; Deborah O Erwin; Susan H Lee; Dana Bovbjerg; Lina Jandorf; Monique Littles; Heiddis B Valdimarsdottir; Theophilus Lewis; Karen Karsif; Bert Petersen; Jenny Romero
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.037

8.  The North Carolina Breast Cancer Screening Program: foundations and design of a model for reaching older, minority, rural women.

Authors:  J A Earp; M Altpeter; L Mayne; C I Viadro; M S O'Malley
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Natural helping functions of lay health advisors in breast cancer education.

Authors:  E Eng; J Smith
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Social support among Latina immigrant women: bridge persons as mediators of cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Melanie R Wasserman; Deborah E Bender; Shoou-Yih Lee; Joseph P Morrissey; Ted Mouw; Edward C Norton
Journal:  J Immigr Minor Health       Date:  2006-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.