Literature DB >> 8333806

Roadblocks to do-not-resuscitate orders. A study in policy implementation.

B E Paris1, V G Carrion, J S Meditch, C F Capello, M N Mulvihill.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation, a potentially lifesaving procedure, is initiated on hospitalized patients who have an arrest in the absence of a written do-not-resuscitate (DNR) order. New York State Law specifies that attending physicians may write a DNR order on an adult patient either with his/her consent or that of a surrogate. Under specified circumstances, concurring physician and witness signatures are also required. This study examines potential obstacles physicians may encounter when implementing a DNR order for a hospitalized patient.
METHODS: Sixty house staff officers and 45 attending physicians at two New York City medical centers responded to a questionnaire listing 18 potential problems in obtaining a DNR order. Using a Likert scale, respondents rated the prevalence of each problem.
RESULTS: Analysis of the data indicates that attending physician's failure to discuss DNR issues with patients and situations involving surrogate decision making are considered major obstacles to obtaining a DNR order. Procedural regulations, including abundant paperwork and witnessed signatures, are not identified as major obstacles.
CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests a need for improved communication among physicians, patients, and surrogates about advance directives, when feasible, either prior to hospitalization or early in its course, in an effort to comply with DNR legislation in a manner that reflects the patient's wishes and best interests.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beth Israel Medical Center (New York City); Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Mount Sinai Medical Center (New York City)

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8333806

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  4 in total

1.  A prospective trial of a new policy eliminating signed consent for do not resuscitate orders.

Authors:  Daniel P Sulmasy; Johanna R Sood; Kenneth Texiera; Ruth L McAuley; Jennifer McGugins; Wayne A Ury
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Autonomy and paternalism in geriatric medicine. The Jewish ethical approach to issues of feeding terminally ill patients, and to cardiopulmonary resuscitation.

Authors:  A J Rosin; M Sonnenblick
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 2.903

Review 3.  Determining resuscitation preferences of elderly inpatients: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Christopher Frank; Daren K Heyland; Benjamin Chen; Donald Farquhar; Kathryn Myers; Ken Iwaasa
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2003-10-14       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  Clinical Prediction Rule for Patient Outcome after In-Hospital CPR: A New Model, Using Characteristics Present at Hospital Admission, to Identify Patients Unlikely to Benefit from CPR after In-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.

Authors:  Satyam Merja; Ryan H Lilien; Hilary F Ryder
Journal:  Palliat Care       Date:  2015-09-20
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.