Literature DB >> 8333164

Michelson contrast, RMS contrast and energy of various spatial stimuli at threshold.

H Kukkonen1, J Rovamo, K Tiippana, R Näsänen.   

Abstract

Contrast sensitivity was measured as a function of median spatial frequency for vertical cosine gratings, narrow-band noise stimuli, and spots with luminance increment or decrement. Contrast sensitivity was expressed in terms of Michelson contrast, RMS contrast, and contrast energy in order to demonstrate the characteristics of various contrast measures. Gratings and noise stimuli had either constant stimulus area or constant number of cycles. Michelson contrast sensitivity was better for gratings than for noise stimuli or spots, whereas RMS contrast sensitivity was almost equal for gratings and noise stimuli but lowest for spots. Contrast energy sensitivity takes into account the stimulus area and was therefore best for spots.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8333164     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90049-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  17 in total

1.  Binocular summation for reflexive eye movements.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 2.  [Contrast vision-definitions, conversions, and equivalence tables].

Authors:  M Bach; M B Hoffmann; H Jägle; S P Heinrich; U Schiefer; W Wesemann
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2017-04       Impact factor: 1.059

3.  A Web simulation of medical image reconstruction and processing as an educational tool.

Authors:  Dimitrios Papamichail; Evaggelos Pantelis; Panagiotis Papagiannis; Pantelis Karaiskos; Evangelos Georgiou
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 4.056

4.  Normalization of neuronal responses in cortical area MT across signal strengths and motion directions.

Authors:  Jianbo Xiao; Yu-Qiong Niu; Steven Wiesner; Xin Huang
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-06-03       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Binocular Summation for Reflexive Eye Movements: A Potential Diagnostic Tool for Stereodeficiencies.

Authors:  Christian Quaia; Edmond J FitzGibbon; Lance M Optican; Bruce G Cumming
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2018-12-03       Impact factor: 4.799

6.  Scale dependence and channel switching in letter identification.

Authors:  Ipek Oruç; Michael S Landy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-08-13       Impact factor: 2.240

7.  Arrayed isoelectric focusing using photopatterned multi-domain hydrogels.

Authors:  Kevin A Yamauchi; Augusto M Tentori; Amy E Herr
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 3.535

8.  Core samples for radiomics features that are insensitive to tumor segmentation: method and pilot study using CT images of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Sebastian Echegaray; Olivier Gevaert; Rajesh Shah; Aya Kamaya; John Louie; Nishita Kothary; Sandy Napel
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-11-18

9.  Comparing Spatial Contrast Sensitivity Functions Measured With Digit and Grating Stimuli.

Authors:  Haiyan Zheng; Menglu Shen; Xianghang He; Rong Cui; Luis Andres Lesmes; Zhong-Lin Lu; Fang Hou
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2019-11-15       Impact factor: 3.283

10.  Unconscious Number Discrimination in the Human Visual System.

Authors:  Ché Lucero; Geoffrey Brookshire; Clara Sava-Segal; Roberto Bottini; Susan Goldin-Meadow; Edward K Vogel; Daniel Casasanto
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.