Literature DB >> 8333078

[Determining rotational errors of the femur by axial computerized tomography in comparison with clinical and conventional radiologic determination].

H Wissing1, B Buddenbrock.   

Abstract

58 patients, suspicious to have a rotation deformity of the femur, were treated between 1981 and 1988 at our hospital. To compare the value of diagnostic methods in measuring the degree of malrotation we estimated this degree using clinical tests and calculated the anteversion of the femoral neck, taking radiographs in the technique of Dunn and Rippstein and a modified method of computed tomography. Surprisingly only in twelve cases the direction of malrotation, not to consider the degree, with all three methods was corresponding. Clinical evaluation only in cases with extreme deformity produces clear results. Maintaining the exact position of the patient, necessary to get reproducible results using conventional X-ray technique, was impossible in most cases of elderly patients with postraumatic joint-stiffness and malalignment. Determination of femoral neck anterversion by means of CT is a quick, reproducible method to calculate the degree of rotation deformation, insensitive to the position of the patient's extremities as far as there is no motion during the time of scan.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8333078     DOI: 10.1007/bf02588038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurgie        ISSN: 0340-2649


  13 in total

1.  [Determination of the antetorsion of the femur neck by means of two x-ray pictures].

Authors:  J RIPPSTEIN
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1955

2.  Anteversion of the neck of the femur; a method of measurement.

Authors:  D M DUNN
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1952-05

3.  [Computed tomographic determination of the anteversion angle. Premises and possibilities].

Authors:  H H Jend
Journal:  Rofo       Date:  1986-04

4.  [Rippstein and Müller roentgenologic determination of the actual femoral neck-shaft and antetorsion angle. 1: Correction of the conversion table and study of the effects of positioning errors].

Authors:  S Grunert; R Brückl; B Rosemeyer
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  [Outward rotational malpositioning following intramedullary nailing of the femur].

Authors:  M Weigert; K Viernstein
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1968-06

6.  [Determination of the accuracy and source of errors in Rippstein's method for measurement of the antetorsion of the coxal of the femur].

Authors:  F Gross; H Haike
Journal:  Arch Orthop Unfallchir       Date:  1970

7.  Ultrasound assessment of femoral anteversion. A comparison with computerised tomography.

Authors:  L Berman; R Mitchell; D Katz
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1987-03

8.  Practical considerations in the use of computed tomography in the measurement of femoral anteversion.

Authors:  D S Weiner; A J Cook
Journal:  Isr J Med Sci       Date:  1980-04

9.  [Determination of the antetorsional angle at the femur with axial computer tomography].

Authors:  R Grote; H Elgeti; D Saure
Journal:  Rontgenblatter       Date:  1980-01

10.  [Determination of rotational defects of the femur by computer tomographic determination of the antetorsion angle of the femoral neck].

Authors:  H Wissing; G Spira
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1986-02
View more
  7 in total

1.  Radiograph-based femur morphing method.

Authors:  E M Zanetti; V Crupi; C Bignardi; P M Calderale
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Compression nailing for posttraumatic rotational femoral deformities: open versus minimally invasive technique.

Authors:  Thomas Mückley; Christian Lerch; Oliver Gonschorek; Ivan Marintschev; Volker Bühren; Gunther O Hofmann
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2005-04-07       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  [Determining the femoral antetorsion angle with a fluoroscopy-based optoelectronic navigation system: a precision analysis].

Authors:  C Keil; J von Recum; L-P Nolte; A Wentzensen; P A Grützner
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Quantitative assessment of changes in lesser trochanter shapes in relation to femoral rotations.

Authors:  Ali Turgut; Anıl Koca; Melikşah Uzakgider; Sertan Hancıoğlu; Serkan Erkuş; Önder Kalenderer
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 1.511

5.  Treatment of distal tibial fractures: plate versus nail: a retrospective outcome analysis of matched pairs of patients.

Authors:  Kasper W Janssen; Jan Biert; Albert van Kampen
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2006-12-12       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Femoroacetabular impingement predisposes to traumatic posterior hip dislocation.

Authors:  Simon D Steppacher; Christoph E Albers; Klaus A Siebenrock; Moritz Tannast; Reinhold Ganz
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Clinical assessment of tibial torsion differences. Do we always need a computed tomography?

Authors:  Humam Hawi; Till Frederik Kaireit; Christian Krettek; Emmanouil Liodakis
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2022-02-10       Impact factor: 2.374

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.