Literature DB >> 8331603

Some comments on the proposed perception of phase and nanosecond time disparities by echolocating bats.

G D Pollak1.   

Abstract

In a series of recent reports, Simmons and his colleagues propose that bats are able to accurately encode the spectral, temporal and phase information of their emitted calls and echoes. The information so encoded is then extracted by the networks of the auditory system with specialized processing. They propose that bats use this information to determine the distance to their target by crosscorrelating the entire structure of the emitted call with the structure of the echo. The idea is that slight deviations in the correlation function can be detected by the bat and the degree of mismatch provides an accurate measure of temporal disparity and hence range. The data in the reports purport to show that bats perceive the phase of ultrasonic signals and that they can resolve temporal disparities of about 10 ns, and thus can distinguish range differences as small as 2 microns. The hypothesis also attempts to explain how a variety of acoustic cues are processed and represented in the auditory system and how they are combined to form a unitary percept of space and fine structure. The theory incorporates some time honored processes of extracting information, such as crosscorrelations. The implications of the hypothesis, however, go far beyond a theory of neural processing and representation of information by ensembles of cells. The hypothesis requires some remarkable abilities, such as the phase coding of ultrasonic signals and a temporal acuity on the order of 10 ns. These features have never been seen in any neurophysiological study of any animal nor has its existence been implied in behavioral studies of other animals.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8331603     DOI: 10.1007/bf00213676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A            Impact factor:   1.836


  6 in total

1.  Discrimination of jittered sonar echoes by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus: the shape of target images in echolocation.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M Ferragamo; C F Moss; S B Stevenson; R A Altes
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  Echolocation in bats: signal processing of echoes for target range.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

3.  Echolocation in bats: some aspects of pulse design.

Authors:  A Novick
Journal:  Am Sci       Date:  1971 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 0.548

4.  Neuronal and behavioral sensitivity to binaural time differences in the owl.

Authors:  A Moiseff; M Konishi
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1981-01       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Convergence of temporal and spectral information into acoustic images of complex sonar targets perceived by the echolocating bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; C F Moss; M Ferragamo
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 6.  A view of the world through the bat's ear: the formation of acoustic images in echolocation.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1989-11
  6 in total
  7 in total

1.  Precision of neural timing: effects of convergence and time-windowing.

Authors:  Michael C Reed; Jacob J Blum; Colleen C Mitchell
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.621

2.  The transfer function of a target limits the jitter detection threshold with signals of echolocating FM-bats.

Authors:  Kristian Beedholm
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2006-01-03       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Phase sensitivity in bat sonar revisited.

Authors:  Sven Schörnich; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 1.836

Review 4.  Evidence for perception of fine echo delay and phase by the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.836

5.  Echo delay versus spectral cues for temporal hyperacuity in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M J Ferragamo; M I Sanderson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.836

6.  Delay accuracy in bat sonar is related to the reciprocal of normalized echo bandwidth, or Q.

Authors:  James A Simmons; Nicola Neretti; Nathan Intrator; Richard A Altes; Michael J Ferragamo; Mark I Sanderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-02-27       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Jittered echo-delay resolution in bottlenose dolphins (Tursiops truncatus).

Authors:  James J Finneran; Ryan Jones; Jason Mulsow; Dorian S Houser; Patrick W Moore
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2018-12-26       Impact factor: 1.836

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.