Literature DB >> 16395614

The transfer function of a target limits the jitter detection threshold with signals of echolocating FM-bats.

Kristian Beedholm1.   

Abstract

The delay jitter discrimination threshold in bats is a disputed subject. Some investigators have obtained results indicating that bats are able to discriminate alternations in delay down to 10 ns, which appears incredible for purely physical reasons. Using actual bat echolocation sequences recorded during an easy detection task to measure simulated delay jitter, it is shown here that jitter detection thresholds in the order of some tens of nanoseconds are actually physically realizable. However, if the transfer function of the target simulating apparatus is not perfect, the lowest thresholds are in the order of hundreds of nanoseconds and variable between individual bats. This phenomenon is shown to arise as a consequence of the variation in signal parameters from call to call. When the transfer function from a real jitter experiment was artificially applied to the echoes, the jitter detection thresholds again were several hundred nanoseconds. This is the first study to point out a limiting role of the transfer function of a system faced with variations in echolocation signal parameters, something that should be considered in evaluating all sonar systems with variable signal structure.

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16395614     DOI: 10.1007/s00359-005-0084-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol        ISSN: 0340-7594            Impact factor:   1.836


  15 in total

1.  Bat sonar: an alternative interpretation of the 10-ns jitter result.

Authors:  K Beedholm; B Møhl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 1.836

2.  The detection of phantom targets in noise by serotine bats; negative evidence for the coherent receiver.

Authors:  N Troest; B Møhl
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1986-10       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Perception of echo phase information in bat sonar.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1979-06-22       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  The resolution of target range by echolocating bats.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1973-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Echolocation in bats: signal processing of echoes for target range.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  Science       Date:  1971-03-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Accuracy of distance measurement in the bat Eptesicus fuscus: theoretical aspects and computer simulations.

Authors:  D Menne; H Hackbarth
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 7.  Some comments on the proposed perception of phase and nanosecond time disparities by echolocating bats.

Authors:  G D Pollak
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.836

8.  Source parameter estimates of echolocation clicks from wild pygmy killer whales (Feresa attenuata).

Authors:  P T Madsen; I Kerr; R Payne
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 9.  Evidence for perception of fine echo delay and phase by the FM bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 1.836

10.  Echo delay versus spectral cues for temporal hyperacuity in the big brown bat, Eptesicus fuscus.

Authors:  J A Simmons; M J Ferragamo; M I Sanderson
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 1.836

View more
  1 in total

1.  Phase sensitivity in bat sonar revisited.

Authors:  Sven Schörnich; Lutz Wiegrebe
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2007-11-22       Impact factor: 1.836

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.