Literature DB >> 8330170

Conventional versus laparoscopic surgery for acute appendicitis.

J J Tate1, S C Chung, J Dawson, H T Leong, A Chan, W Y Lau, A K Li.   

Abstract

A total of 155 consecutive patients with suspected acute appendicitis were studied to compare laparoscopic and conventional operations. Patients were not randomized: laparoscopy was performed when a suitably trained surgeon and laparoscopic instruments were available. Laparoscopic appendicectomy was attempted in 51 patients and was successful in 46 (90 per cent); all conversions to open operation were because of marked inflammatory adhesions around the appendix. There were no intraoperative complications. Reintroduction of normal diet and discharge from hospital occurred earlier after laparoscopic than open surgery (P < 0.05). The requirement for analgesia after successful laparoscopic surgery was less than that after conventional appendicectomy, but the difference was not significant. The incidence of wound infection was reduced after the laparoscopic procedure (P = 0.06). It is concluded that laparoscopic appendicectomy is practical and may have advantages over conventional operation, although a randomized study is necessary.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8330170     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800800636

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  18 in total

1.  Training in laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  Karl J Sweeney; Mary Dillon; Sean M Johnston; Frank B Keane; Kevin C Conlon
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 2.  The E.A.E.S. Consensus Development Conferences on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and hernia repair. Consensus statements--September 1994. The Educational Committee of the European Association for Endoscopic Surgery.

Authors:  E Neugebauer; H Troidl; C K Kum; E Eypasch; M Miserez; A Paul
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  Pelvic abscess following laparoscopic appendectomy.

Authors:  F A Frizelle; G B Hanna
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a trainee's perspective.

Authors:  A W Meshikhes; S A Al-Dhurais; A S Al-Joaib; Q Al-Doulah; E Al-Askar
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1996-01       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Hiding the scars of an appendectomy. New method of port placement.

Authors:  D Yarish; M McKenney; D Sleeman; L Martin; U Desai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Preoperative administration of antibiotics in patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Y Murao; S Ueda; S Miyamoto
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 2.549

7.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for perforated appendicitis: a comparison with open appendectomy.

Authors:  A Yagmurlu; A Vernon; D C Barnhart; K E Georgeson; C M Harmon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-05-26       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Surgical site infection after laparoscopic and open appendectomy: a multicenter large consecutive cohort study.

Authors:  Yan Xiao; Gang Shi; Jin Zhang; Jian-Guo Cao; Li-Jun Liu; Ting-Hao Chen; Zhi-Zhou Li; Hong Wang; Han Zhang; Zhao-Fen Lin; Jun-Hua Lu; Tian Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-10-11       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study.

Authors:  Namir Katkhouda; Rodney J Mason; Shirin Towfigh; Anna Gevorgyan; Rahila Essani
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Laparoscopic versus conventional surgery for suspected appendicitis in women.

Authors:  G Zaninotto; M Rossi; M Anselmino; M Costantini; S Pianalto; N Baldan; D Pizzato; E Ancona
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.