Literature DB >> 8329251

Comparison of the sedative and amnesic effects of midazolam and propofol.

M R Polster1, P A Gray, G O'Sullivan, R A McCarthy, G R Park.   

Abstract

We have compared the sedative and amnesic effects of midazolam and propofol in 35 volunteers. Sedation was measured by simple reaction time immediately before and after a bolus injection and 1 h after the commencement of a subsequent continuous infusion. Memory was measured three times using two memory tests: perceptual facilitation provided an implicit memory measure and recognition provided an explicit memory measure. Propofol and midazolam had similar sedative effects both immediately after bolus doses and after 1-h continuous infusions of the drugs. In contrast, midazolam had a more profound amnesic effect than propofol on the recognition memory test. The drugs had little effect on performance with the implicit memory test. Performance on the memory tests was unrelated to sedation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8329251     DOI: 10.1093/bja/70.6.612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  10 in total

1.  Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of a new highly concentrated intranasal midazolam formulation for conscious sedation.

Authors:  Lenneke Schrier; Rob Zuiker; Frans W H M Merkus; Erica S Klaassen; Zheng Guan; Bert Tuk; Joop M A van Gerven; Ronald van der Geest; Geert Jan Groeneveld
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2016-12-20       Impact factor: 4.335

Review 2.  Propofol: a review of its use in intensive care sedation of adults.

Authors:  Kate McKeage; Caroline M Perry
Journal:  CNS Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.749

Review 3.  Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  H M Bryson; B R Fulton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Inhibition by propofol (2,6 di-isopropylphenol) of the N-methyl-D-aspartate subtype of glutamate receptor in cultured hippocampal neurones.

Authors:  B A Orser; M Bertlik; L Y Wang; J F MacDonald
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 5.  Propofol. An overview of its pharmacology and a review of its clinical efficacy in intensive care sedation.

Authors:  B Fulton; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Cognitive and EEG recovery following bolus intravenous administration of anesthetic agents.

Authors:  S La Marca; R J Lozito; R W Dunn
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 4.530

Review 7.  Analgo-sedation of patients with burns outside the operating room.

Authors:  Cesare Gregoretti; Daniela Decaroli; Quirino Piacevoli; Alice Mistretta; Nicoletta Barzaghi; Nicola Luxardo; Irene Tosetti; Luisa Tedeschi; Laura Burbi; Paolo Navalesi; Fabio Azzeri
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  A comparative study of efficacy of propofol auto-co-induction versus midazolam propofol co-induction using the priming principle.

Authors:  Roopam Kataria; Ajay Singhal; Sukirti Prakash; Ishwar Singh
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2010-11

9.  Effect of intramuscular midazolam premedication on patient satisfaction in women undergoing general anaesthesia: a randomised control trial.

Authors:  Seung Woo Song; Younghyun Jin; Hyunjae Lim; Jonghoon Lee; Kwang Ho Lee
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-06-22       Impact factor: 3.006

10.  Implicit transitive inference and the human hippocampus: does intravenous midazolam function as a reversible hippocampal lesion?

Authors:  Anthony J Greene
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2007-09-24       Impact factor: 3.759

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.