Literature DB >> 832919

A dose-response study on urethane carcinogenesis in rats and mice.

D Schmähl, R Port, J Wahrendorf.   

Abstract

Sprague-Dawley rats and NMRI mice were treated with urethane in the drinking water for 2 years. In both species the daily doses were: 100, 500, 2,500, and 12,500 mug/kg. The frequency of animals with malignancies increased steadily with increasing doses, beginning from 500 mug/kg/day for rats, and from 100 mug/kg/day for mice. To evaluate the possible cancer risk for man due to urethane in beverages, the observed response rates were used to extrapolate responses at lower doses. At a daily dose of 0.14 mug/kg/day (corresponding to daily consumption of a beverage with 10 ppb urethane by a 70-kg man) the upper risk limits were estimated to be 3.2 in 100,000 for rats, and 470 in 100,000 for mice (modified Mantel-Bryan procedure). Problems in calculating a possible cancer risk for man on the basis of animal observations are discussed. Since treatment of beverages with diethyldicarbonate leads to the formation of urethane, and since a cancer risk to man from urethane cannot be excluded, replacement of diethyldicarbonate by a toxicologically unobjectionale compound is called for.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1977        PMID: 832919     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910190111

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  8 in total

1.  Measuring Pressure Volume Loops in the Mouse.

Authors:  DeWayne Townsend
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 1.355

2.  The problem of estimating safe dose levels in chemical carcinogenesis.

Authors:  J Wahrendorf
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  Possible in vivo formation of a carcinogenic substance from diethyl pyrocarbonate and ammonia.

Authors:  E Uzvölgyi; F Boján
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.553

4.  The problem of thresholds in chemical carcinogenesis some views on theoretical and practical aspects.

Authors:  R Preussmann
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 4.553

5.  New short term prediction method for chemical carcinogenicity by hepatic transcript profiling following 28-day toxicity tests in rats.

Authors:  Hiroshi Matsumoto; Yoshikuni Yakabe; Fumiyo Saito; Koichi Saito; Kayo Sumida; Masaru Sekijima; Koji Nakayama; Hideki Miyaura; Masanori Otsuka; Tomoyuki Shirai
Journal:  Cancer Inform       Date:  2011-10-27

6.  The p53 heterozygous knockout mouse as a model for chemical carcinogenesis in vascular tissue.

Authors:  N G Carmichael; E L Debruyne; D Bigot-Lasserre
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 9.031

7.  A carcinogenic potency database of the standardized results of animal bioassays.

Authors:  L S Gold; C B Sawyer; R Magaw; G M Backman; M de Veciana; R Levinson; N K Hooper; W R Havender; L Bernstein; R Peto
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  1984-12       Impact factor: 9.031

8.  Quantitative risk assessment of carcinogenicity of urethane (ethyl carbamate) on the basis of long-term oral administration to B6C3F1 mice.

Authors:  K Inai; K Arihiro; Y Takeshima; S Yonehara; Y Tachiyama; N Khatun; T Nishisaka
Journal:  Jpn J Cancer Res       Date:  1991-04
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.