Literature DB >> 8328314

Impact of anomalous vertebral segmentation on measurements of bone mineral density.

N F Peel1, A Johnson, N A Barrington, T W Smith, R Eastell.   

Abstract

In anteroposterior (AP) bone mineral density (BMD) measurements of the lumbar spine (LS), the presence of ribs is used to identify vertebra T12. Similarly, in lateral LS-BMD measurements, the position of the iliac crest is used to identify the lumbar vertebrae. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of variations in spinal segmentation and iliac crest position on BMD measurements. In 375 women (ages 50-85 years) radiographs were taken of the thoracic and lumbar spine, as well as AP measurement of LS-BMD, by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA). In 121 subjects lateral decubitus LS-BMD was also measured. Anomalous spinal segmentation was found in 16.5%, and L1 would have been incorrectly identified on the AP-DXA image in 13%. The change in BMC and BMD between adjacent vertebrae was greater in the upper than the lower lumbar spine. Misidentification of L1 for T12 resulted in underestimation of the bone mineral content in grams (BMC) of L1 by a mean of 11.5 +/- 14.4% (SD; range -33.5 to 33.5%). For the usual region of interest, L2-4, the BMC (g) was underestimated by 8.4 +/- 8.7% (range -1.5 to 29.2%), with the BMD (g/cm2) underestimated by 3.6 +/- 4.8% (range -5.4 to 11.6%). The position of the iliac crest on the lateral decubitus DXA scans would have led to misidentification of either L2 or L4 for L3 in 15 cases (12%). This resulted in the BMD of L3 being underestimated by 2.7 +/- 19.4% (range -242.4 to 34.6%).(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8328314     DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.5650080610

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Miner Res        ISSN: 0884-0431            Impact factor:   6.741


  8 in total

1.  Lumbar Vertebrae Morphological Analysis and an Additional Approach for Vertebrae Identification in Lumbar Spine DXA Images.

Authors:  Wenmin Guan; Wei Yu; Qiang Lin; Zaizhu Zhang; Guiying Du; Junping Tian; Ying Xu; Evelyn Hsieh
Journal:  J Clin Densitom       Date:  2018-09-15       Impact factor: 2.617

Review 2.  Fundamentals and pitfalls of bone densitometry using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA).

Authors:  Nelson B Watts
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-08-21       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Risk of vertebral fracture and relationship to bone mineral density in steroid treated rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  N F Peel; D J Moore; N A Barrington; D E Bax; R Eastell
Journal:  Ann Rheum Dis       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 19.103

4.  High Bone Mass is associated with bone-forming features of osteoarthritis in non-weight bearing joints independent of body mass index.

Authors:  C L Gregson; S A Hardcastle; A Murphy; B Faber; W D Fraser; M Williams; G Davey Smith; J H Tobias
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2017-01-07       Impact factor: 4.398

5.  Lumbar spine bone mineral density Z-score discrepancies by dual X-ray absorptiometry do not predict vertebral fractures in children.

Authors:  Tasma Harindhanavudhi; Anna Petryk; Richard Jones; Amanda Regodón Wallin; James S Hodges; Sara Van Nortwick; Bradley S Miller; Tara L Holm; Kyriakie Sarafoglou
Journal:  J Investig Med       Date:  2018-04-04       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Correlation between intervertebral disc degeneration and bone mineral density difference: a retrospective study of postmenopausal women using an eight-level MRI-based disc degeneration grading system.

Authors:  Yihui Zhang; Beibei Liu; Rui Zhang; Xiaofei Ma; Hui Guo
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2022-09-03       Impact factor: 2.562

7.  Dual energy X-ray absorptiometry: Pitfalls in measurement and interpretation of bone mineral density.

Authors:  M K Garg; Sandeep Kharb
Journal:  Indian J Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2013-03

8.  Standardised quantitative morphometry: a modified approach for quantitative identification of prevalent vertebral deformities.

Authors:  G Jiang; L Ferrar; N A Barrington; R Eastell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-05-26       Impact factor: 4.507

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.