Literature DB >> 8325722

Reliability and within subject variability of VE, VO2, heart rate and blood pressure during submaximum cycle ergometry.

M D Becque1, V Katch, C Marks, R Dyer.   

Abstract

To assess the reliability and within subject variability of steady-rate ventilation (VE), oxygen uptake (VO2), heart rate, systolic and diastolic blood pressure, 4 subjects exercised for 10 minutes at 3 work rates on a bicycle ergometer: 50 W, 125 W and 55% of maximum work rate (55% max). Each testing session included two work rates and only 2 testing sessions were scheduled per week. The order of the work rates was counterbalanced. In 8 to 10 weeks, 3 of the subjects completed 20 trials at 50 W while the fourth subject completed 11 trials, and all the subjects completed 10 trials at 125 W and 55% max. The within subject variability (S2w) was expressed as a percent of the mean steady-rate response. VO2 ranged from 21.2% to 27.5% of VO2max at 50 W, from 37.7% to 49.7% at 125 W and from 42.9% to 63.7% at 55% max. The S2w averaged 6.8% for VE, 4.3% for VO2, 3.2% for heart rate, 7.3% for systolic blood pressure and 10.5% for diastolic blood pressure. Reliability coefficients were calculated for the steady-rate scores by dividing the between subject variation by the total variation. The reliability was similar for VE, VO2 and heart rate and ranged from r = 0.69 to r = 0.97. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure reliabilities were lower and ranged from r = 0.27 and r = 0.80. In summary, the steady-rate ventilation, oxygen uptake and heart rate responses were reliable and consistent. The reliability of blood pressure was low. It is possible that this low reliability may result from variability in stroke volume or total peripheral resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8325722     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-1021167

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Sports Med        ISSN: 0172-4622            Impact factor:   3.118


  4 in total

Review 1.  Heart rate monitoring: applications and limitations.

Authors:  Juul Achten; Asker E Jeukendrup
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 2.  Automated metabolic gas analysis systems: a review.

Authors:  D J Macfarlane
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 11.136

3.  Effects of Face Masks on Physical Performance and Physiological Response during a Submaximal Bicycle Ergometer Test.

Authors:  Benjamin Steinhilber; Robert Seibt; Julia Gabriel; Joulia Brountsou; Markus Muljono; Tomasz Downar; Mona Bär; Rosina Bonsch; Adrian Brandt; Peter Martus; Monika A Rieger
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-01-18       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Inter-unit variability in two ParvoMedics TrueOne 2400 automated metabolic gas analysis systems.

Authors:  D J Macfarlane; H L Wu
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-09-04       Impact factor: 3.078

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.