Literature DB >> 8324792

A single five minute period of rapid atrial pacing fails to limit infarct size in the in situ rabbit heart.

M S Marber1, D M Walker, D J Eveson, J M Walker, D M Yellon.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Rapid pacing has been shown to precondition the dog heart against ischaemic dysrhythmia. The aim of this study was to determine whether rapid pacing could also limit infarct size.
METHODS: Rabbits (n = 5) were rapidly paced via the left atrium at 420-480 beats.min-1. Five min of rapid pacing and 10 min of recovery in sinus rhythm were followed by 45 min of regional ischaemia and 120 min of reperfusion. Control rabbits (n = 9) were treated identically without prior rapid pacing. Infarct size was determined in both groups using tetrazolium and expressed as a percentage of the area at risk demarcated by fluorescent microspheres. In a separate series of experiments, rapidly paced Langendorff perfused rabbit hearts (n = 9) were used to determine coronary flow under perfusion conditions designed to simulate the in vivo situation during rapid pacing.
RESULTS: Rapid pacing caused a fall in systolic pressure from 91.4(SEM 4.5) to 47.0(5.9) mm Hg (p < 0.01) and diastolic pressure from 67.2(2.9) to 23.6(3.2) mm Hg (p < 0.01). Both recovered within 30 s of cessation of pacing. During rapid pacing the action potential duration shortened from 192(13) to 128(5) ms (p = 0.01) and developed electrical alternans (n = 4). Following rapid pacing the ECG showed either ST depression or T wave inversion (n = 4). Despite these profound changes, rapid pacing did not reduce infarct size v control [52.7(4.6)% v 60.8(9.1)% of the area at risk, respectively]. The in vitro experiments estimated that rapid pacing would result in a reduction in coronary flow to 44% of that in sinus rhythm without a significant rise in lactate efflux.
CONCLUSIONS: In our model, pretreatment with rapid pacing fails to reduce infarct size. The most likely reason for this is that rapid pacing at a rate of 480 beats.min-1 does not cause myocardial ischaemia of sufficient severity to trigger the preconditioning response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8324792     DOI: 10.1093/cvr/27.4.597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiovasc Res        ISSN: 0008-6363            Impact factor:   10.787


  2 in total

1.  Spinal cord stimulation or ischaemic preconditioning?

Authors:  M Marber; D Walker; D Yellon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-09-18

2.  Intermittent pacing therapy favorably modulates infarct remodeling.

Authors:  André Uitterdijk; Tirza Springeling; Kevin C M Hermans; Daphne Merkus; Vincent J de Beer; Charlotte Gorsse-Bakker; Eric Mokelke; Evangelos P Daskalopoulos; Piotr A Wielopolski; Jack P M Cleutjens; W Matthijs Blankesteijn; Frits W Prinzen; Willem J van der Giessen; Robert-Jan M van Geuns; Dirk J Duncker
Journal:  Basic Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-06       Impact factor: 17.165

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.