| Literature DB >> 28386775 |
André Uitterdijk1, Tirza Springeling1,2, Kevin C M Hermans3, Daphne Merkus1, Vincent J de Beer1, Charlotte Gorsse-Bakker1, Eric Mokelke4,5, Evangelos P Daskalopoulos3, Piotr A Wielopolski2, Jack P M Cleutjens6, W Matthijs Blankesteijn3, Frits W Prinzen7, Willem J van der Giessen1, Robert-Jan M van Geuns1,2, Dirk J Duncker8.
Abstract
Despite early revascularization, remodeling and dysfunction of the left ventricle (LV) after acute myocardial infarction (AMI) remain important therapeutic targets. Intermittent pacing therapy (IPT) of the LV can limit infarct size, when applied during early reperfusion. However, the effects of IPT on post-AMI LV remodeling and infarct healing are unknown. We therefore investigated the effects of IPT on global LV remodeling and infarct geometry in swine with a 3-day old AMI. For this purpose, fifteen pigs underwent 2 h ligation of the left circumflex coronary artery followed by reperfusion. An epicardial pacing lead was implanted in the peri-infarct zone. After three days, global LV remodeling and infarct geometry were assessed using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Animals were stratified into MI control and IPT groups. Thirty-five days post-AMI, follow-up MRI was obtained and myofibroblast content, markers of extracellular matrix (ECM) turnover and Wnt/frizzled signaling in infarct and non-infarct control tissue were studied. Results showed that IPT had no significant effect on global LV remodeling, function or infarct mass, but modulated infarct healing. In MI control pigs, infarct mass reduction was principally due to a 26.2 ± 4.4% reduction in infarct thickness (P ≤ 0.05), whereas in IPT pigs it was mainly due to a 35.7 ± 4.5% decrease in the number of infarct segments (P ≤ 0.05), with no significant change in infarct thickness. Myofibroblast content of the infarct zone was higher in IPT (10.9 ± 2.1%) compared to MI control (5.4 ± 1.6%; P ≤ 0.05). Higher myofibroblast presence did not coincide with alterations in expression of genes involved in ECM turnover or Wnt/frizzled signaling at 5 weeks follow-up. Taken together, IPT limited infarct expansion and altered infarct composition, showing that IPT influences remodeling of the infarct zone, likely by increasing regional myofibroblast content.Entities:
Keywords: Infarct expansion; Infarct geometry; Infarct healing; Myocardial infarction; Myofibroblasts; Swine
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28386775 PMCID: PMC5383690 DOI: 10.1007/s00395-017-0616-3
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Basic Res Cardiol ISSN: 0300-8428 Impact factor: 17.165
Expression of genes related to myofibroblasts and extracellular matrix biology
| Non-MI control | MI control | IPT | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Myofibroblast presence, regulation and differentiation | |||
| αSMA | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 1.2 ± 0.3*,† |
| Vimentin | 2.7 ± 0.6 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 1.6 ± 0.4 |
| Desmin | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 |
| SPARC | 0.5 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.5 | 1.9 ± 0.7** |
| Tenascin-C | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.9 | 0.6 ± 0.2* |
| VEGF-A | 1.3 ± 0.4 | 0.6 ± 0.1** | 0.6 ± 0.3** |
| β-Catenin | 0.7 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.1 | 0.4 ± 0.1 |
| TGFβ1 | 0.8 ± 0.3 | 0.8 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.1 |
| TGFβ2 | 2.7 ± 1.0 | 1.8 ± 0.6 | 1.4 ± 0.1 |
| TGFβ3 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 6.1 ± 2.2** | 5.2 ± 1.8 |
| TGFβ1R | 3.3 ± 1.3 | 1.1 ± 0.2* | 0.9 ± 0.1* |
| TGFβ2R | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 0.8 ± 0.1* | 0.7 ± 0.1* |
| Fzd2 | 0.4 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.4** | 1.7 ± 0.3* |
| Fzd4 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 1.3 ± 0.3 | 0.9 ± 0.2 |
| LRP5 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.8 ± 0.2* | 0.5 ± 0.2 |
| LRP6 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.7 ± 0.1 | 0.7 ± 0.1 |
| LOX | 2.1 ± 0.6 | 2.0 ± 0.7 | 3.6 ± 0.7 |
| APC | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.2 | 0.8 ± 0.1 |
| Axin2 | 3.1 ± 1.2 | 3.6 ± 1.2 | 3.5 ± 1.0 |
| ID1 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | 0.6 ± 0.2 | 0.7 ± 0.2 |
| PAI1 | 2.6 ± 1.2 | 1.0 ± 0.2** | 0.6 ± 0.2* |
| Extracellular matrix composition and turnover | |||
| Col1a1 | 0.9 ± 0.2 | 2.1 ± 0.7 | 4.7 ± 1.3*,† |
| Col1a2 | 2.7 ± 0.7 | 1.9 ± 0.6 | 3.5 ± 1.3 |
| Col3a1 | 0.3 ± 0.1 | 1.7 ± 0.5** | 2.0 ± 0.6* |
| MMP-2 | 1.4 ± 0.4 | 1.7 ± 0.5 | 2.5 ± 0.7 |
| MMP-9 | 1.9 ± 0.6 | 4.5 ± 1.6 | 4.5 ± 1.5 |
| TIMP-1 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | 1.5 ± 0.4 | 3.4 ± 1.5*,†† |
| CTGF | 1.6 ± 1.3 | 1.8 ± 0.5 | 0.9 ± 0.3 |
Data are presented as mean ± SEM and expressed as ratios to housekeeping gene cyclophilin; MI control: n = 9; IPT: n = 6, non-MI control: n = 5
APC adenomatous polyposis coli, Axin axis inhibition protein, αSMA alpha smooth muscle actin, Col collagen, CTGF connective tissue growth factor, Fzd frizzled, ID inhibitor of DNA binding, LOX lysyl oxidase, LRP low-density lipoprotein receptor-related protein, MMP matrix metalloproteinase, PAI plasminogen activator inhibitor, RT-qPCR reverse transcriptase quantitative polymerase chain reaction, SPARC secreted protein acidic and rich in cysteine, TGF transforming growth factor, TIMP tissue inhibitor of metalloproteinases, VEGF-A vascular endothelial growth factor A
* P ≤ 0.05 vs. non-MI control
** P ≤ 0.10 vs. non-MI control
† P ≤ 0.05 IPT vs. corresponding MI control
†† P ≤ 0.10 IPT vs. corresponding MI control
Global LV function and infarct geometry
| Post-MI | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3 days BL | 37 days FU | |
| Global LV anatomy and function | ||
| Body weight (kg) | ||
| MI control | 29 ± 0 | 38 ± 1* |
| IPT | 28 ± 1 | 37 ± 1* |
| LV mass (g) | ||
| MI control | 56 ± 1 | 58 ± 1 |
| IPT | 55 ± 2 | 55 ± 1 |
| Heart rate (bpm) | ||
| MI control | 93 ± 3 | 80 ± 6 |
| IPT | 100 ± 6 | 78 ± 11 |
| End-diastolic volume (ml) | ||
| MI control | 80 ± 3 | 113 ± 5* |
| IPT | 81 ± 2 | 110 ± 8* |
| End-systolic volume (ml) | ||
| MI control | 54 ± 3 | 68 ± 3* |
| IPT | 53 ± 2 | 67 ± 8 |
| Stroke volume (ml) | ||
| MI control | 27 ± 2 | 45 ± 4* |
| IPT | 28 ± 2 | 43 ± 3* |
| Ejection fraction (%) | ||
| MI control | 33 ± 2 | 40 ± 2** |
| IPT | 35 ± 3 | 40 ± 3* |
| Infarct geometry | ||
| Remote LV mass (g) | ||
| MI control | 39 ± 1 | 47 ± 1* |
| IPT | 38 ± 1 | 46 ± 1* |
| Infarct mass (g) | ||
| MI control | 17.6 ± 1.4 | 11.7 ± 0.8* |
| IPT | 17.1 ± 1.2 | 9.3 ± 0.9*,†† |
| Infarct size (% LV) | ||
| MI control | 31 ± 2 | 20 ± 1* |
| IPT | 31 ± 2 | 17 ± 2* |
| Infarct thickness (mm) | ||
| MI control | 6.2 ± 0.2 | 4.5 ± 0.2* |
| IPT | 5.9 ± 0.2 | 4.9 ± 0.3 |
| Infarct length (#slices) | ||
| MI control | 7.8 ± 0.6 | 8.3 ± 0.6 |
| IPT | 8.8 ± 0.3 | 8.0 ± 0.5* |
| Infarct length (mm) | ||
| MI control | 47 ± 4 | 50 ± 4 |
| IPT | 53 ± 2 | 48 ± 3*,† |
| Infarct circumference (#segments) | ||
| MI control | 13.5 ± 0.8 | 12.0 ± 1.1 |
| IPT | 13.6 ± 1.6 | 9.4 ± 1.3*,† |
| Infarct circumference (mm) | ||
| MI control | 62 ± 3 | 65 ± 6 |
| IPT | 61 ± 5 | 52 ± 5 |
| Total # infarcted segments | ||
| MI control | 73 ± 8 | 71 ± 9 |
| IPT | 90 ± 9 | 58 ± 8*,† |
Data are mean ± SEM; MI control, n = 9; IPT, n = 6
BL baseline, FU follow-up, LV left ventricle
* P < 0.05, vs. corresponding BL
** P < 0.10, vs. corresponding BL
† P < 0.05, †† P < 0.10, change by IPT vs. change in control
Fig. 1Effect of IPTVVI on infarct geometry. Percent changes in infarct geometry from 3 days baseline values at 5-week follow-up in eight MI control (white bars) and six IPTVVI (gray bars) swine. Shown are changes in infarct mass, infarct thickness, total number of infarcted segments, number of infarcted slices, and average circumferential infarct length. Data are mean ± SEM; *P ≤ 0.05 vs. corresponding BL; † P ≤ 0.05, †† P ≤ 0.10, vs. change in MI control
Fig. 2IPTVVI increases myofibroblast presence in the infarct region. Left panel αSMA stained infarct tissue of two MI control and two IPTVVI swine (magnification ×20). Brown staining indicates myofibroblasts. Right panel percent αSMA-positive cells in infarct tissue from eight MI control (white bar) and six IPTVVI (gray bar) swine. Data are mean ± SEM; *P ≤ 0.05 vs. MI control
Fig. 3Circulating levels of markers of extracellular matrix and inflammation. Markers for extracellular matrix and inflammation in arterial plasma of five control (white bars) and five IPTVVI (gray bars) swine. Data are mean ± SEM; *P ≤ 0.05 vs. MI control