Literature DB >> 8317520

Successful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries after sacrospinous uterosacral fixation in five of nineteen patients.

S R Kovac1, S H Cruikshank.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine whether sacrospinous uterosacral ligament fixation restores the uterus to its normal anatomic position, preserving uterine function and allowing future childbearing. STUDY
DESIGN: This study was undertaken at two separate medical centers. Women with symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse who desired either uterine preservation or future childbearing were included.
RESULTS: We successfully performed sacrospinous fixation of the uterosacral ligaments in 19 patients. Five patients have since been delivered vaginally (for a total of six deliveries). Normal anatomic restoration was accomplished in all but one patient.
CONCLUSIONS: Sacrospinous uterosacral ligament fixation is an acceptable surgical means to care for symptomatic uterovaginal prolapse in women desiring uterine preservation or future childbearing. To our knowledge, this is the first report of successful pregnancies and vaginal deliveries after sacrospinous uterosacral fixation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8317520     DOI: 10.1016/0002-9378(93)90689-g

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  20 in total

Review 1.  Uterine preservation during surgery for uterovaginal prolapse: a review.

Authors:  Aparna Diwan; Charles R Rardin; Neeraj Kohli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug

2.  The effectiveness of the sacrospinous hysteropexy for the primary treatment of uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Joyce de Jong; Marieke Huisman; Steven Schraffordt Koops; Peter Heintz; Huub van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-03-24

Review 3.  Vaginal surgery for uterine descent; which options do we have? A review of the literature.

Authors:  Viviane Dietz; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; Steven E Schraffordt Koops; C Huub van der Vaart
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2008-12-16

Review 4.  Management options for women with uterine prolapse interested in uterine preservation.

Authors:  Nathan Kow; Howard B Goldman; Beri Ridgeway
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2013-10       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Uterine-preserving POP surgery.

Authors:  Robert Gutman; Christopher Maher
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Is hysterectomy or the use of graft necessary for the reconstructive surgery for uterine prolapse?

Authors:  Myung Jae Jeon; Hyun Joo Jung; Hyun Jung Choi; Sei Kwang Kim; Sang Wook Bai
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2007-10-10

7.  Pregnancy following incontinence surgery.

Authors:  M Dainer; C D Hall; J Choe; N Bhatia
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  1998

Review 8.  Hysteropreservation versus hysterectomy in the surgical treatment of uterine prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sofia Andrade de Oliveira; Marcelo C M Fonseca; Maria A T Bortolini; Manoel J B C Girão; Matheus T Roque; Rodrigo A Castro
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-08-05       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 9.  Sacrospinous hysteropexy: review and meta-analysis of outcomes.

Authors:  Shveta Kapoor; Kanapathippillai Sivanesan; Jessica Amy Robertson; Mayooran Veerasingham; Vishal Kapoor
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-03-03       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Sexual function after sacrospinous fixation for vaginal vault prolapse: bad or mad?

Authors:  Marc Baumann; Claudia Salvisberg; Michel Mueller; Annette Kuhn
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.