Literature DB >> 8316884

Back pain in primary care. Outcomes at 1 year.

M Von Korff1, R A Deyo, D Cherkin, W Barlow.   

Abstract

Outcomes of primary care back pain patients (N = 1128) were studied at 1 year after seeking care. Changes in depression depending on outcome, and predictors of poor outcome were evaluated. Less than one back pain patient in five reported recent onset (first onset within the previous 6 months). One year after seeking care, the large majority of both recent and nonrecent-onset patients reported having back pain in the previous month (69% vs. 82%). A significant minority of both recent and nonrecent-onset patients had either a poor functional outcome (14% vs. 21%) or continuing high intensity pain without appreciable disability (10% vs. 16%). Predictors of poor outcome included pain-related disability, days in pain, lower educational attainment, and female gender. Among initially dysfunctional patients with persistent pain, one half were improved and one third had a good outcome at the 1-year follow-up. Among initially dysfunctional patients who experienced a good outcome, elevated depressive symptoms improved to normal levels at follow-up. The outcome of back pain was predicted by pain-related disability and days in pain rather than by recency of onset, so it may be more meaningful to distinguish characteristic levels of pain intensity, pain-related disability, and pain persistence than to classify patients as acute or chronic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8316884     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-199306000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  73 in total

Review 1.  Methodological challenges in studying recurrence of low back pain.

Authors:  Radoslaw Wasiak; Glenn S Pransky; Barbara S Webster
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-03

2.  Routine primary care management of acute low back pain: adherence to clinical guidelines.

Authors:  Violeta González-Urzelai; Loreto Palacio-Elua; Josefina López-de-Munain
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-11-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 3.  Prognostic factors for musculoskeletal pain in primary care: a systematic review.

Authors:  Christian D Mallen; George Peat; Elaine Thomas; Kate M Dunn; Peter R Croft
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Screening for patients at risk of developing chronic incapacity.

Authors:  C J Main; P J Watson
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1995-12

5.  Using Patient-reported Outcomes Measurement Information System Measures to Understand the Relationship Between Improvement in Physical Function and Depressive Symptoms.

Authors:  Casey M Beleckas; Jason Guattery; Aaron M Chamberlain; Taleef Khan; Michael P Kelly; Ryan P Calfee
Journal:  J Am Acad Orthop Surg       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 3.020

Review 6.  Exercises for prevention of recurrences of low-back pain.

Authors:  Brian Kl Choi; Jos H Verbeek; Wilson Wai-San Tam; Johnny Y Jiang
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-01-20

7.  Pregnancy Research on Osteopathic Manipulation Optimizing Treatment Effects: the PROMOTE study.

Authors:  Kendi L Hensel; Steve Buchanan; Sarah K Brown; Mayra Rodriguez; des Anges Cruser
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-07-25       Impact factor: 8.661

8.  The outcomes among patients presenting in primary care with a physical symptom at 5 years.

Authors:  Jeffrey L Jackson; Mark Passamonti
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Development and evaluation of a quality assessment instrument for occupational physicians.

Authors:  W E van der Weide; J H Verbeek; F J van Dijk; C T Hulshof
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.402

10.  Outcome of low back pain in general practice. Evidence based practice can improve outcome.

Authors:  M Deane; D Crick
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-10-17
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.