Literature DB >> 25068560

Pregnancy Research on Osteopathic Manipulation Optimizing Treatment Effects: the PROMOTE study.

Kendi L Hensel1, Steve Buchanan2, Sarah K Brown3, Mayra Rodriguez4, des Anges Cruser5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) to reduce low back pain and improve functioning during the third trimester in pregnancy and to improve selected outcomes of labor and delivery. STUDY
DESIGN: Pregnancy research on osteopathic manipulation optimizing treatment effects was a randomized, placebo-controlled trial of 400 women in their third trimester. Women were assigned randomly to usual care only (UCO), usual care plus OMT (OMT), or usual care plus placebo ultrasound treatment (PUT). The study included 7 treatments over 9 weeks. The OMT protocol included specific techniques that were administered by board-certified OMT specialists. Outcomes were assessed with the use of self-report measures for pain and back-related functioning and medical records for delivery outcomes.
RESULTS: There were 136 women in the OMT group: 131 women in the PUT group and 133 women in the UCO group. Characteristics at baseline were similar across groups. Findings indicate significant treatment effects for pain and back-related functioning (P < .001 for both groups), with outcomes for the OMT group similar to that of the PUT group; however, both groups were significantly improved compared with the UCO group. For secondary outcome of meconium-stained amniotic fluid, there were no differences among the groups.
CONCLUSION: OMT was effective for mitigating pain and functional deterioration compared with UCO; however, OMT did not differ significantly from PUT. This may be attributed to PUT being a more active treatment than intended. There was no higher likelihood of conversion to high-risk status based on treatment group. Therefore, OMT is a safe, effective adjunctive modality to improve pain and functioning during the third trimester.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  low back pain; osteopathic manipulation; pregnancy

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 25068560      PMCID: PMC4275366          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2014.07.043

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  22 in total

1.  Effect of osteopathic manipulative treatment of length of stay for pancreatitis: a randomized pilot study.

Authors:  J M Radjieski; M A Lumley; M S Cantieri
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  1998-05

2.  Low back pain and pelvic pain during pregnancy: prevalence and risk factors.

Authors:  Ingrid M Mogren; Anna I Pohjanen
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2005-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Influence of some biomechanical factors on low-back pain in pregnancy.

Authors:  H C Ostgaard; G B Andersson; A B Schultz; J A Miller
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 3.468

4.  A study of the natural history of back pain. Part I: development of a reliable and sensitive measure of disability in low-back pain.

Authors:  M Roland; R Morris
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1983-03       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  American Osteopathic Association guidelines for osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) for patients with low back pain.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Osteopath Assoc       Date:  2010-11

Review 6.  Paracetamol in pregnancy and the risk of wheezing in offspring: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Eyers; M Weatherall; S Jefferies; R Beasley
Journal:  Clin Exp Allergy       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 5.018

7.  Responsiveness of functional status in low back pain: a comparison of different instruments.

Authors:  A J H M Beurskens; H C W de Vet; A J A Köke
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 6.961

Review 8.  Acetaminophen use and the risk of asthma in children and adults: a systematic review and metaanalysis.

Authors:  Mahyar Etminan; Mohsen Sadatsafavi; Siavash Jafari; Mimi Doyle-Waters; Kevin Aminzadeh; J Mark FitzGerald
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2009-08-20       Impact factor: 9.410

9.  Low back pain during pregnancy: prevalence, risk factors, and outcomes.

Authors:  Shu-Ming Wang; Peggy Dezinno; Inna Maranets; Michael R Berman; Alison A Caldwell-Andrews; Zeev N Kain
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 7.661

10.  Osteopathic manual treatment and ultrasound therapy for chronic low back pain: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  John C Licciardone; Dennis E Minotti; Robert J Gatchel; Cathleen M Kearns; Karan P Singh
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2013 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.166

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Evidence-Based Evaluation of Complementary Health Approaches for Pain Management in the United States.

Authors:  Richard L Nahin; Robin Boineau; Partap S Khalsa; Barbara J Stussman; Wendy J Weber
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 7.616

Review 2.  The Role of Osteopathic Care in Gynaecology and Obstetrics: An Updated Systematic Review.

Authors:  Nuria Ruffini; Giandomenico D'Alessandro; Annalisa Pimpinella; Matteo Galli; Tiziana Galeotti; Francesco Cerritelli; Marco Tramontano
Journal:  Healthcare (Basel)       Date:  2022-08-18

Review 3.  Interventions for preventing and treating low-back and pelvic pain during pregnancy.

Authors:  Sarah D Liddle; Victoria Pennick
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-09-30

Review 4.  The paradox of sham therapy and placebo effect in osteopathy: A systematic review.

Authors:  Francesco Cerritelli; Marco Verzella; Luca Cicchitti; Giandomenico D'Alessandro; Nicola Vanacore
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  The Effectiveness of Non-Pharmaceutical Interventions Upon Pregnancy-Related Low Back Pain: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Ioannis Koukoulithras; Alexandra Stamouli; Spyridon Kolokotsios; Minas Plexousakis; Christine Mavrogiannopoulou
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2021-01-30

Review 6.  The Main Changes in Pregnancy-Therapeutic Approach to Musculoskeletal Pain.

Authors:  Felicia Fiat; Petru Eugen Merghes; Alexandra Denisa Scurtu; Bogdan Almajan Guta; Cristina Adriana Dehelean; Narcis Varan; Elena Bernad
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2022-08-17       Impact factor: 2.948

Review 7.  Effectiveness of conservative therapy on pain, disability and quality of life for low back pain in pregnancy: A systematic review of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Laísa B Maia; Letícia G Amarante; Débora F M Vitorino; Rodrigo O Mascarenhas; Ana Cristina R Lacerda; Bianca M Lourenço; Vinícius C Oliveira
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2021-07-22       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 8.  The effectiveness of complementary manual therapies for pregnancy-related back and pelvic pain: A systematic review with meta-analysis.

Authors:  Helen Hall; Holger Cramer; Tobias Sundberg; Lesley Ward; Jon Adams; Craig Moore; David Sibbritt; Romy Lauche
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Osteopathic Manipulative Treatment Effect on Pain Relief and Quality of Life in Oncology Geriatric Patients: A Nonrandomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Chiara Arienti; Teresa Bosisio; Silvia Ratti; Rossella Miglioli; Stefano Negrini
Journal:  Integr Cancer Ther       Date:  2018-08-31       Impact factor: 3.279

10.  Osteopathic care for spinal complaints: A systematic literature review.

Authors:  Nick Verhaeghe; Janne Schepers; Patrick van Dun; Lieven Annemans
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.