Literature DB >> 8314816

Comparison of bone ingrowth into cobalt chrome sphere and titanium fiber mesh porous coated cementless canine acetabular components.

M Jasty1, C R Bragdon, T Haire, R D Mulroy, W H Harris.   

Abstract

Bone ingrowth into uncemented hemispherical canine acetabular components porous-coated with cobalt chrome spheres was compared to those porous-coated with titanium fiber mesh. While good bone ingrowth was noted in both types of porous coatings at 6 weeks after surgery with no difference in the histologic quality of the ingrown bone, quantitation of bone ingrowth showed that significantly more bone grew into titanium fiber mesh porous-coated components. The mean amount of bone ingrowth measured 10.5% of the area of the porous coating with fiber mesh coatings and only 5.5% of the area of the porous coating with spherical coatings (significant difference at P < .0005). The mean area density of the ingrown bone inside the pores measured 21.5% of the pore area with fiber mesh coatings, also significantly greater than 13.4% of the pore area with sphere coatings (P < .025). The ingrown bone penetrated a mean 66% of the depth of the porous layer with fiber mesh coatings compared to 32% of the depth of the porous layer with spherical coating (significant difference at P < .0005). The mean extent of the periphery of the porous layer with bone ingrowth was 88% for the mesh coatings and 55% for the spherical coatings (also a significant difference at P < .01).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8314816     DOI: 10.1002/jbm.820270511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res        ISSN: 0021-9304


  8 in total

1.  Does using autograft bone chips achieve consistent bone ingrowth in primary TKA?

Authors:  Roy D Bloebaum; Karyn E Koller; Bettina M Willie; Aaron A Hofmann
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Osseointegration into a novel titanium foam implant in the distal femur of a rabbit.

Authors:  Bettina M Willie; Xu Yang; Natalie H Kelly; Justin Merkow; Shawn Gagne; Robin Ware; Timothy M Wright; Mathias P G Bostrom
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 3.368

3.  Is There a Benefit to Modularity in 'Simpler' Femoral Revisions?

Authors:  James I Huddleston; Matthew W Tetreault; Michael Yu; Hany Bedair; Viktor J Hansen; Ho-Rim Choi; Stuart B Goodman; Scott M Sporer; Craig J Della Valle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Influence of porosity on mechanical properties and in vivo response of Ti6Al4V implants.

Authors:  Amit Bandyopadhyay; Felix Espana; Vamsi Krishna Balla; Susmita Bose; Yusuke Ohgami; Neal M Davies
Journal:  Acta Biomater       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 8.947

Review 5.  Dental implant systems.

Authors:  Yoshiki Oshida; Elif B Tuna; Oya Aktören; Koray Gençay
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2010-04-12       Impact factor: 5.923

6.  Osseous integration in porous tantalum implants.

Authors:  Christos G Paganias; George A Tsakotos; Stephanos D Koutsostathis; George A Macheras
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 1.251

Review 7.  The Clinical Application of Porous Tantalum and Its New Development for Bone Tissue Engineering.

Authors:  Gan Huang; Shu-Ting Pan; Jia-Xuan Qiu
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 3.623

8.  Porous titanium fiber mesh with tailored elasticity and its effect on stromal cells.

Authors:  Evy Aerts; Jinmeng Li; Mies J Van Steenbergen; Tanika Degrande; John A Jansen; X Frank Walboomers
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater       Date:  2020-01-14       Impact factor: 3.368

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.