Literature DB >> 8314552

Flow cytometric and cytogenetic analyses in human spontaneous abortions.

R De Vita1, A Calugi, D Cavallo, P Eleuteri, A Vizzone.   

Abstract

Cytogenetic and flow cytometric analyses were performed on 38 human spontaneous abortions in an attempt to obtain information on karyotype abnormalities and to compare the two approaches of analysis. In 19 cases, it was not possible to perform cytogenetic analysis because too long a time had passed between surgical sampling and cell culture, and in vitro culture failed. Of the 19 cases analyzed, 10/19 showed a normal karyotype and 5/19 showed a single trisomy (2/5 trisomies involved chromosome 16, 1/5 trisomy involved chromosome 18, 1/5 trisomy involved chromosome 20, and 1/5 was Klinefelter syndrome). Of the remaining 4/19 cases, 2/19 showed a polyploid condition (1 tetraploidy and 1 triploidy), 1/19 a double trisomy (chromosomes 13 and 21), and 1/19 a pentasomy of the sex chromosomes (49,XXXXY). Flow cytometric analysis was performed on all abortive samples. The samples were subdivided, when possible, into two portions conventionally named "amniotic" and "chorionic", using the amniotic membrane as an anatomical reference. Maternal blood lymphocytes were used as a diploid standard for each sample. In the 19 cases not analyzed by the cytogenetic approach, flow cytometric analysis showed 9 diploid and 10 aneuploid DNA distributions. In the remaining 19 cases, analyzed with both approaches, the comparison of DNA estimations using cytogenetic and flow cytometric analyses showed good agreement. In the cases with karyotype abnormalities, flow cytometric measurement provided evidence of an alteration of DNA content with respect to the diploid standard. Flow cytometric analysis showed a diploid distribution, whereas cytogenetic analysis revealed chromosomal abnormalities in only 4/19 cases. These discordant results could be related to mosaic conditions or maternal cell contamination. Moreover, cytogenetic and flow cytometric analyses were performed on 2 amniotic cell cultures, and concordant results were obtained. The results obtained suggest that a combination of these techniques is beneficial in attempts to obtain information about DNA content alterations, even when cultures fail, and in screening studies of human abortions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8314552     DOI: 10.1007/bf00217763

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Genet        ISSN: 0340-6717            Impact factor:   4.132


  13 in total

1.  Rapid identification of sex in birds by flow cytometry.

Authors:  D Nakamura; T R Tiersch; M Douglass; R W Chandler
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1990

2.  Cytogenetic analysis of human solid tumors by in situ hybridization with a set of 12 chromosome-specific DNA probes.

Authors:  H van Dekken; J G Pizzolo; V E Reuter; M R Melamed
Journal:  Cytogenet Cell Genet       Date:  1990

3.  FISHing cuts the angst in amniocentesis.

Authors:  L Roberts
Journal:  Science       Date:  1991-10-18       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  Multiple fluorescence in situ hybridization.

Authors:  P M Nederlof; S van der Flier; J Wiegant; A K Raap; H J Tanke; J S Ploem; M van der Ploeg
Journal:  Cytometry       Date:  1990

5.  The predictive value of chorionic villus histology for identifying chromosomally normal and abnormal spontaneous abortions.

Authors:  C Minguillon; B Eiben; S Bähr-Porsch; M Vogel; I Hansmann
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1989-07       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  Confined chorionic mosaicism in prenatal diagnosis.

Authors:  D K Kalousek; F J Dill; T Pantzar; B C McGillivray; S L Yong; R D Wilson
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1987-10       Impact factor: 4.132

7.  Cytogenetic analysis of early human abortuses after preparation of chromosomes directly from chorionic villi.

Authors:  I Hansmann; I Bartels; I Schübbe
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 4.132

8.  Chromosome studies at the paediatric necropsy.

Authors:  G R Sutherland; R F Carter; R Bauld; I I Smith; A D Bain
Journal:  Ann Hum Genet       Date:  1978-10       Impact factor: 1.670

9.  Prevalence and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in a sample of first trimester internal abortions.

Authors:  S Guerneri; D Bettio; G Simoni; B Brambati; A Lanzani; M Fraccaro
Journal:  Hum Reprod       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 6.918

Review 10.  Cytogenetics of pregnancy wastage.

Authors:  A Boué; J Boué; A Gropp
Journal:  Adv Hum Genet       Date:  1985
View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  1(st) trimester miscarriage: four decades of study.

Authors:  Kathy Hardy; Philip John Hardy
Journal:  Transl Pediatr       Date:  2015-04
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.