Literature DB >> 8311940

The function of a hydrogen peroxide-detecting electroenzymatic glucose electrode is markedly impaired in human sub-cutaneous tissue and plasma.

W Kerner1, M Kiwit, B Linke, F S Keck, H Zier, E F Pfeiffer.   

Abstract

Electroenzymatic glucose sensors implanted into sub-cutaneous (s.c.) tissue of human subjects and experimental animals exhibit lower sensitivities to glucose than in buffer solutions before implantation. The mechanism of the decrease of sensitivity is not known. Sensors used in this study were fabricated from platinum wires (diameter 0.125 mm) with covalently bound glucose oxidase at the tip of the wire. After coating the tip with polyurethane, wires were placed into 27 gauge steel needles. Sensors were operated potentiostatically at 700 mV against Ag/AgCl pseudo-reference electrodes. These sensors were implanted s.c. in 6 diabetic patients for 7 h. In 4 patients, sensors were responsive to successive increases of plasma glucose levels. Mean sensitivity to glucose in s.c. tissue was 29% of in vitro sensitivity. In 2 patients there was a sudden decrease of sensor currents, unrelated to glucose, shortly after implantation. Sensors were inhibited in human plasma to a similar extent. When sensors were exposed to native plasma and to plasma ultrafiltrate (mol. wt. < 10 kDa) for 10 h, identical decreases of signals were found. Exposure to dialysed plasma (mol. wt. > 12 kDa) caused much less decrease of sensor signals. Losses of sensor sensitivities to glucose in s.c. tissue and in plasma were totally reversible upon re-exposure of sensors to buffer solutions. We conclude that sensor inactivation in plasma and possibly in s.c. tissue is caused by low molecular weight substances not retained by the polyurethane membrane.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8311940     DOI: 10.1016/0956-5663(93)80032-k

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron        ISSN: 0956-5663            Impact factor:   10.618


  11 in total

Review 1.  In vitro, in vivo and post explantation testing of glucose-detecting biosensors: current methods and recommendations.

Authors:  Heidi E Koschwanez; William M Reichert
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 12.479

Review 2.  Biocompatibility issues of implantable drug delivery systems.

Authors:  H Park; K Park
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  Modulation of fibroblast inflammatory response by surface modification of a perfluorinated ionomer.

Authors:  Thelma I Valdes; Winston Ciridon; Buddy D Ratner; James D Bryers
Journal:  Biointerphases       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.456

4.  Interstitium versus Blood Equilibrium in Glucose Concentration and its Impact on Subcutaneous Continuous Glucose Monitoring Systems.

Authors:  Cosimo Scuffi
Journal:  Eur Endocrinol       Date:  2014-02-28

5.  Microsphere erosion in outer hydrogel membranes creating macroscopic porosity to counter biofouling-induced sensor degradation.

Authors:  S Vaddiraju; Y Wang; L Qiang; D J Burgess; F Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 6.986

6.  Redundancy in Glucose Sensing: Enhanced Accuracy and Reliability of an Electrochemical Redundant Sensor for Continuous Glucose Monitoring.

Authors:  Amin Sharifi; Andrea Varsavsky; Johanna Ulloa; Jodie C Horsburgh; Sybil A McAuley; Balasubramanian Krishnamurthy; Alicia J Jenkins; Peter G Colman; Glenn M Ward; Richard J MacIsaac; Rajiv Shah; David N O'Neal
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2016-05-03

7.  Atomic layer deposition-based functionalization of materials for medical and environmental health applications.

Authors:  Roger J Narayan; Shashishekar P Adiga; Michael J Pellin; Larry A Curtiss; Alexander J Hryn; Shane Stafslien; Bret Chisholm; Chun-Che Shih; Chun-Ming Shih; Shing-Jong Lin; Yea-Yang Su; Chunming Jin; Junping Zhang; Nancy A Monteiro-Riviere; Jeffrey W Elam
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  A percutaneous device as model to study the in vivo performance of implantable amperometric glucose sensors.

Authors:  M Gerritsen; A Kros; J A Lutterman; R J Nolte; J A Jansen
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 9.  Common causes of glucose oxidase instability in in vivo biosensing: a brief review.

Authors:  James M Harris; Catherine Reyes; Gabriel P Lopez
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2013-07-01

Review 10.  Emerging synergy between nanotechnology and implantable biosensors: a review.

Authors:  Santhisagar Vaddiraju; Ioannis Tomazos; Diane J Burgess; Faquir C Jain; Fotios Papadimitrakopoulos
Journal:  Biosens Bioelectron       Date:  2009-12-11       Impact factor: 10.618

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.