Literature DB >> 8311290

Triple anesthetic combination: propofol-midazolam-alfentanil.

H R Vinik1, E L Bradley, I Kissin.   

Abstract

The hypnotic effects of propofol, midazolam, alfentanil, and their binary and triple combinations, were studied in 130 unpremedicated patients in a randomized, double-blind fashion. The ability to open eyes on verbal command was used as an end-point. Dose-response curves for the three drugs given separately and in combination were determined with a probit procedure and the ED50 values were compared with an isobolographic analysis. The ratios of a single-drug fractional dose (ED50 = 1.0) to a combined fractional dose (in fractions of single-drug ED50 values) indicating the degree of superadditivity (synergism) were: 1.4 (P < 0.05) for propofol-alfentanil, 1.8 (P < 0.0005) for midazolam-propofol, 2.8 (P < 0.0001) for midazolam-alfentanil, and 2.6 (P < 0.0001) for propofol-midazolam-alfentanil. The results indicate that the propofol-midazolam-alfentanil interaction produces a profound hypnotic synergism which is not significantly different from that of the binary midazolam-alfentanil combination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8311290     DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199402000-00026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN: 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  13 in total

Review 1.  Pharmacodynamic considerations for moderate and deep sedation.

Authors:  Daniel E Becker
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2012

2.  Population pharmacodynamic modelling of lorazepam- and midazolam-induced sedation upon long-term continuous infusion in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Eleonora L Swart; Klaas P Zuideveld; Joost de Jongh; Meindert Danhof; Lambertus G Thijs; Robert M J Strack van Schijndel
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2006-01-20       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 3.  Adverse drug interactions.

Authors:  Daniel E Becker
Journal:  Anesth Prog       Date:  2011

Review 4.  Regional anaesthesia in the elderly: a clinical guide.

Authors:  Ban C H Tsui; Alese Wagner; Brendan Finucane
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

5.  Haemodynamic instability and myocardial ischaemia during carotid endarterectomy: a comparison of propofol and isoflurane.

Authors:  W A Mutch; I W White; N Donen; I R Thomson; M Rosenbloom; M Cheang; M West
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 5.063

Review 6.  Propofol. An update of its use in anaesthesia and conscious sedation.

Authors:  H M Bryson; B R Fulton; D Faulds
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 7.  Pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic relationships for opioids in balanced anaesthesia.

Authors:  H J Lemmens
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 8.  Propofol. An overview of its pharmacology and a review of its clinical efficacy in intensive care sedation.

Authors:  B Fulton; E M Sorkin
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 9.546

9.  A previously published propofol-remifentanil response surface model does not predict patient response well in video-assisted thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Hsin-Yi Wang; Chien-Kun Ting; Jing-Yang Liou; Kun-Hui Chen; Mei-Young Tsou; Wen-Kuei Chang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  A Response Surface Model Exploration of Dosing Strategies in Gastrointestinal Endoscopies Using Midazolam and Opioids.

Authors:  Jing-Yang Liou; Chien-Kun Ting; Ming-Chih Hou; Mei-Yung Tsou
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.