Literature DB >> 16425056

Population pharmacodynamic modelling of lorazepam- and midazolam-induced sedation upon long-term continuous infusion in critically ill patients.

Eleonora L Swart1, Klaas P Zuideveld, Joost de Jongh, Meindert Danhof, Lambertus G Thijs, Robert M J Strack van Schijndel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present investigation was to develop a population pharmacodynamic model for midazolam- and lorazepam-induced sedation upon long-term continuous infusion in critically ill patients.
METHODS: The study was conducted in 59 patients receiving lorazepam and 54 patients receiving midazolam by continuous infusion for at least 24 h. Repeated blood samples were obtained for determination of the concentrations of lorazepam and midazolam. The level of sedation was assessed using a 5-point sedation scale.
RESULTS: The pharmacokinetics of lorazepam and midazolam was described with previously proposed pharmacokinetic models. For the pharmacodynamics, the probability that the sedation was equal to or more than a specific score was described using a sigmoid E(max) model. The EC(50) values of lorazepam for the sedation scores equal or larger than 2-5 were 6.1, 57, 184 and 529 ng/ml, respectively. The corresponding values for midazolam were 216, 483, 1,100 and 2,200 ng/ml. Inter-individual variability in the EC(50) values was relatively high with a CV of 68% for lorazepam and 86% for midazolam (p=0.035). No covariates explaining part of the observed inter-individual variability were identified.
CONCLUSION: The population pharmacodynamic model shows a similarly wide intra- and inter-individual variability in the pharmacodynamics of both lorazepam and midazolam. Thus, the previously observed differences in "ease of titration" between lorazepam and midazolam are unrelated to pharmacodynamic factors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16425056     DOI: 10.1007/s00228-005-0085-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol        ISSN: 0031-6970            Impact factor:   2.953


  22 in total

Review 1.  Using and understanding sedation scoring systems: a systematic review.

Authors:  B De Jonghe; D Cook; C Appere-De-Vecchi; G Guyatt; M Meade; H Outin
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 17.440

2.  Pharmacokinetics of midazolam and its main metabolite 1-hydroxymidazolam in intensive care patients.

Authors:  R Boulieu; B Lehmann; F Salord; C Fisher; D Morlet
Journal:  Eur J Drug Metab Pharmacokinet       Date:  1998 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.441

3.  Beyond the Ramsay scale: need for a validated measure of sedating drug efficacy in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  J Hansen-Flaschen; J Cowen; R C Polomano
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  Triple anesthetic combination: propofol-midazolam-alfentanil.

Authors:  H R Vinik; E L Bradley; I Kissin
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 5.108

5.  Assessment of depth of midazolam sedation using objective parameters.

Authors:  C Haberthür; F Lehmann; R Ritz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 17.440

6.  The effects of acute changes in renal function on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam during long-term infusion in ICU patients.

Authors:  J J Driessen; T B Vree; P J Guelen
Journal:  Acta Anaesthesiol Belg       Date:  1991

Review 7.  The altered pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of drugs commonly used in critically ill patients.

Authors:  A Bodenham; M P Shelly; G R Park
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 6.447

8.  Prolonged sedation due to accumulation of conjugated metabolites of midazolam.

Authors:  T M Bauer; R Ritz; C Haberthür; H R Ha; W Hunkeler; A J Sleight; G Scollo-Lavizzari; W E Haefeli
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1995-07-15       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Comparative population pharmacokinetics of lorazepam and midazolam during long-term continuous infusion in critically ill patients.

Authors:  Eleonora L Swart; Klaas P Zuideveld; Joost de Jongh; Meindert Danhof; Lambertus G Thijs; Robert M J Strack van Schijndel
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 4.335

10.  Chronic benzodiazepine administration. I. Tolerance is associated with benzodiazepine receptor downregulation and decreased gamma-aminobutyric acidA receptor function.

Authors:  L G Miller; D J Greenblatt; J G Barnhill; R I Shader
Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 4.030

View more
  8 in total

1.  Effect of dexmedetomidine, midazolam, and propofol on lipopolysaccharide-stimulated dendritic cells.

Authors:  Feng Guo; Ying Ding; Xue Yu; Xiujun Cai
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2018-04-24       Impact factor: 2.447

2.  Differential depression of neuronal network activity by midazolam and its main metabolite 1-hydroxymidazolam in cultured neocortical slices.

Authors:  Monika Balk; Harald Hentschke; Uwe Rudolph; Bernd Antkowiak; Berthold Drexler
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 3.  Psychotropic drug therapy in patients in the intensive care unit - usage, adverse effects, and drug interactions: a review.

Authors:  Mojtaba Shafiekhani; Mahtabalsadat Mirjalili; Afsaneh Vazin
Journal:  Ther Clin Risk Manag       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 2.423

4.  Midazolam Infusion and Disease Severity Affect the Level of Sedation in Children: A Parametric Time-to-Event Analysis.

Authors:  Parth J Upadhyay; Nienke J Vet; Sebastiaan C Goulooze; Elke H J Krekels; Saskia N de Wildt; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2021-10-18       Impact factor: 4.200

5.  Remimazolam besylate versus propofol for long-term sedation during invasive mechanical ventilation: a pilot study.

Authors:  Xiaobo Yang; Yun Tang; Yuan Yu; Huaqing Shu; Yin Yuan; Hong Liu; Xiaojing Zou; Shiying Yuan; You Shang
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2022-09-16       Impact factor: 19.334

6.  Dexmedetomidine use in the ICU: are we there yet?

Authors:  Shakeel Ahmed; Raghavan Murugan
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-05-31       Impact factor: 9.097

7.  Effects of dexmedetomidine and propofol on patient-ventilator interaction in difficult-to-wean, mechanically ventilated patients: a prospective, open-label, randomised, multicentre study.

Authors:  Giorgio Conti; Vito Marco Ranieri; Roberta Costa; Chris Garratt; Andrew Wighton; Giorgia Spinazzola; Rosario Urbino; Luciana Mascia; Giuliano Ferrone; Pasi Pohjanjousi; Gabriela Ferreyra; Massimo Antonelli
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2016-07-02       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Population pharmacodynamic modelling of midazolam induced sedation in terminally ill adult patients.

Authors:  Linda G Franken; Brenda C M de Winter; Anniek D Masman; Monique van Dijk; Frans P M Baar; Dick Tibboel; Birgit C P Koch; Teun van Gelder; Ron A A Mathot
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2017-10-26       Impact factor: 4.335

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.