Literature DB >> 8303017

Prenatal care needs assessment comparing service use and outcomes in Fresno, CA.

C C Korenbrot1, L Simpson, C S Phibbs.   

Abstract

The authors performed a prenatal care needs assessment for Fresno County, CA, using data from a sample of 11,878 birth certificates for the county for 1989. Birth records, patterns of prenatal care utilization, and low birth weight outcomes in the county were compared with those in a random sample of 11,826 certificates derived from births in the remainder of the State. Bivariate techniques were used in calculating care utilization rates. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used in associating rates of prenatal care visits and gestational month of initiation of prenatal care with low weight birth outcomes. County women entered prenatal care as early as women in the remainder of the State, but did not return as often for prenatal care visits. Their rate of return for followup visits was 29.9 percent, compared with 24.8 percent for women in all other counties (P < 0.001). County women with the lowest rates of visits had 1.4 to 1.9 times the risk of having a low weight birth than other county women with higher rates of visits, and a significantly higher risk than for women of all other counties. An intensive visit schedule for high-risk care was provided 28.9 percent of county women, compared with 33.0 percent of women in all other counties (P < 0.001). County women who received a high-risk intensive visit schedule were 2.5 times more likely to have a low weight birth than county women who did not receive the schedule. For all other women in the State, the comparable risk was 2.1 times. Improvements in the number and content of prenatal care visits were shown to have a high likelihood of substantially improving birth weight outcomes for pregnancies among Fresno County women.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8303017      PMCID: PMC1402244     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  8 in total

1.  Physician role performance and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  D E Larsen; I Rootman
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  1976-01       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Medicaid prenatal care: a comparison of use and outcomes in fee-for-service and managed care.

Authors:  J W Krieger; F A Connell; J P LoGerfo
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1992-02       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  Source of bias in prenatal care utilization indices: implications for evaluating the Medicaid expansion.

Authors:  G R Alexander; M E Tompkins; D J Petersen; J Weiss
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.308

4.  Using medical care: the views and experiences of high-risk mothers.

Authors:  A Oakley
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 3.402

5.  Race, birth weight, and mortality rates.

Authors:  R David
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Sociodemographic factors and the quality of prenatal care.

Authors:  M J Hansell
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The validity of gestational age estimation by menstrual dating in term, preterm, and postterm gestations.

Authors:  M S Kramer; F H McLean; M E Boyd; R H Usher
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-12-09       Impact factor: 56.272

Review 8.  Content of prenatal care in the United States. A historic perspective.

Authors:  E Hemminki
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 2.983

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  Ethnic disparity in the performance of prenatal nutrition risk assessment among Medicaid-eligible women.

Authors:  E Fuentes-Afflick; C C Korenbrot; J Greene
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1995 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Partner violence during pregnancy: prevalence, effects, screening, and management.

Authors:  Beth A Bailey
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2010-08-09
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.