Literature DB >> 8299450

Prior feeding alters the response to the 50-g glucose challenge test in pregnancy. The Staub-Traugott effect revisited.

G F Lewis1, C McNally, J D Blackman, K S Polonsky, W M Barron.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of prior meal ingestion on the glucose, insulin, and C-peptide response to a 50-g glucose challenge test in the third trimester of pregnancy. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: Ten pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus and 12 nondiabetic pregnant control subjects matched for age and weight underwent a 50-g glucose challenge test on three occasions within a 2-wk period, in random order. On one occasion the test was administered in the fasting state (fasting glucose challenge test), on a second occasion the test was administered 1 h after ingestion of a standard mixed meal (1-h postprandial study), and on a third occasion the test was administered 2 h after ingestion of a standard mixed meal (2-h postprandial study).
RESULTS: In the control subjects, the plasma glucose level 1 h after ingestion of 50 g of glucose was higher in the fasting study (7.8 +/- 0.4 mM, 7 of 12 subjects with glucose > or = 7.8 mM) than in the 1-h postprandial study (6.7 +/- 0.3 mM, 3 of 12 subjects with glucose > or = 7.8 mM) and the 2-h postprandial study of (6.3 +/- 0.4 mM, 3 of 12 with glucose > or = 7.8 mM) (P < 0.01). In the postprandial studies of control subjects, insulin and C-peptide levels were higher at the time of ingestion of the 50 g of glucose, but the early (1 h) insulin secretory response was less than in the fasting study. In the diabetic patients, glucose levels 1 h after 50-g glucose ingestion were similar in the fasting study (10.5 +/- 0.4 mM, no subjects with glucose value < 7.8 mM) and the 1-h postprandial study (11.0 +/- 0.6 mM, 1 subject with glucose < 7.8 mM), but was lower in the 2-h postprandial study (9.3 +/- 0.3 mM, 1 subject with glucose < 7.8 mM) (P < 0.03). In contrast to the control subjects, the insulin secretory response to 50 g of oral glucose was greater in the two postprandial studies than in the fasting study.
CONCLUSIONS: We have reached the following conclusions. 1) In nondiabetic gravidas, plasma glucose concentrations 1 h after ingestion of a 50-g oral glucose load are higher if administered in the fasting state compared with the postprandial state. 2) During normal pregnancy the Staub-Traugott Effect, i.e., improved glucose disposal after successive glucose load administrations, occurs and appears to be caused by mechanisms other than enhanced insulin secretion with successive glucose loads. 3) The effect of the prandial state on plasma glucose response to the 50-g glucose challenge test used to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus may be of sufficient magnitude to significantly alter the operating characteristics, i.e., sensitivity and specificity, of this test.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8299450     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.16.12.1551

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  10 in total

Review 1.  Screening for gestational diabetes mellitus based on different risk profiles and settings for improving maternal and infant health.

Authors:  Joanna Tieu; Andrew J McPhee; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-03

2.  Meal timing affects glucose tolerance, substrate oxidation and circadian-related variables: A randomized, crossover trial.

Authors:  C Bandín; F A J L Scheer; A J Luque; V Ávila-Gandía; S Zamora; J A Madrid; P Gómez-Abellán; M Garaulet
Journal:  Int J Obes (Lond)       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.095

3.  Using fasting plasma glucose concentrations to screen for gestational diabetes mellitus: prospective population based study.

Authors:  D Perucchini; U Fischer; G A Spinas; R Huch; A Huch; R Lehmann
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-09-25

Review 4.  Different strategies for diagnosing gestational diabetes to improve maternal and infant health.

Authors:  Diane Farrar; Lelia Duley; Therese Dowswell; Debbie A Lawlor
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-08-23

Review 5.  Screening and subsequent management for gestational diabetes for improving maternal and infant health.

Authors:  Joanna Tieu; Philippa Middleton; Andrew J McPhee; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2010-07-07

6.  Pregnancy Hyperglycaemia and Risk of Prenatal and Postpartum Depressive Symptoms.

Authors:  Tianyi Huang; Sheryl L Rifas-Shiman; Karen A Ertel; Janet Rich-Edwards; Ken Kleinman; Matthew W Gillman; Emily Oken; Tamarra James-Todd
Journal:  Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol       Date:  2015-06-08       Impact factor: 3.980

7.  Factors Associated with Risk of Perinatal Depressive Symptoms Among Puerto Rican Women with Hyperglycemia.

Authors:  Tiffany A Moore Simas; Katherine Leung; Emily Nuss; Michelle Marieni; Bess Marcus; Milagros C Rosal; Lisa Chasan-Taber
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2022-04-06

8.  The relationship between markedly elevated glucose challenge test results and the rate of gestational diabetes mellitus and gestational impaired glucose tolerance.

Authors:  Deniz Karcaaltincaba; Sadiman Altinbas; Mesut Akyol; Tugba Ensari; Serdar Yalvac
Journal:  Ann Saudi Med       Date:  2012 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.526

9.  Diabetes care in black and white veterans in the southeastern U.S.

Authors:  Jennifer G Twombly; Qi Long; Ming Zhu; Peter W F Wilson; K M Venkat Narayan; Lisa-Ann Fraser; Brian C Webber; Lawrence S Phillips
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 19.112

10.  Is Afamin a novel biomarker for gestational diabetes mellitus? A pilot study.

Authors:  Angela Köninger; Annette Mathan; Pawel Mach; Mirjam Frank; Boerge Schmidt; Ekkehard Schleussner; Rainer Kimmig; Alexandra Gellhaus; Hans Dieplinger
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 5.211

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.