Literature DB >> 8293750

A double-blind study comparing safety, tolerability and efficacy of iodixanol 320 mgI/ml and ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml in cerebral arteriography.

Y Palmers1, D De Greef, B H Grynne, J Smits, E Put.   

Abstract

Iodixanol is a new nonionic dimer, isotonic with blood at all concentrations. Iodixanol 320 mgI/ml was compared in a double-blind, randomized study to the ionic dimer ioxaglate 320 mgI/ml for evaluation of safety and efficacy parameters during cerebral arteriography. Eighty adult patients were enrolled and all completed the trial. Radiographic efficacy was assessed from the diagnostic information and the radiographic density. Safety was evaluated by recording discomfort and other adverse events, changes in ECG, heart rate and blood pressure, changes in intra-arterial blood pressure and circulation time. No difference between the two contrast media were noted radiographically. No clinically important changes from baseline or between the two contrast media were found in ECG, heart rate, blood pressure or intra-arterial blood pressure. Although not statistically significant, a somewhat longer mean circulation time was found with iodixanol, probably due to its slightly higher viscosity. Injection-associated warmth sensation and pain were more intense with ioxaglate than with iodixanol, and pain was statistically more frequent after injection of ioxaglate. A high incidence of adverse events other than discomfort is reported in this study, mainly related to the selective arteriographic procedure itself. The adverse events related to the contrast medium were more frequent with ioxaglate (27% of the total number of adverse events) than with iodixanol (10%). The new isotonic nonionic dimer iodixanol offers significantly better comfort to the patient than does ioxaglate. This is an important feature, especially in relatively risky procedures that are unpleasant for the patients, such as conventional cerebral angiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8293750     DOI: 10.1016/0720-048x(93)90105-v

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  5 in total

1.  Patient discomfort associated with the use of intra-arterial iodinated contrast media: a meta-analysis of comparative randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Peter A McCullough; Patrizio Capasso
Journal:  BMC Med Imaging       Date:  2011-05-24       Impact factor: 1.930

2.  Delayed adverse reaction to contrast-enhanced CT: a prospective single-center study comparison to control group without enhancement.

Authors:  Shaun Loh; Sepideh Bagheri; Richard W Katzberg; Maxwell A Fung; Chin-Shang Li
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2010-04-20       Impact factor: 11.105

Review 3.  Contrast-induced acute kidney injury: specialty-specific protocols for interventional radiology, diagnostic computed tomography radiology, and interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Stanley Goldfarb; Peter A McCullough; John McDermott; Spencer B Gay
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 7.616

4.  Iodixanol in intra-arterial cerebral digital subtraction angiography: a comparison with iohexol.

Authors:  B E Kendall; A Sheppick; J O Nossen; J M Stevens
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.804

5.  Iodixanol vs iopamidol in intravenous DSA of the abdominal aorta and lower extremity arteries: a comparative phase-III trial.

Authors:  R Fischbach; P Landwehr; K Lackner; J O Nossen; W Heindel; K J Berg; G Eichhorn; T F Jacobsen
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 5.315

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.