Literature DB >> 8291967

The effects of functional electrical stimulation on shoulder subluxation, arm function recovery, and shoulder pain in hemiplegic stroke patients.

P D Faghri1, M M Rodgers, R M Glaser, J G Bors, C Ho, P Akuthota.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of a functional electrical stimulation (FES) treatment program designed to prevent glenohumeral joint stretching and subsequent subluxation and shoulder pain in stroke patients. Twenty-six recent hemiplegic stroke patients with shoulder muscle flaccidity were randomly assigned to either a control group (n = 13; 5 female, and 8 male) or experimental group (n = 13; 6 female, and 7 male). Both groups received conventional physical therapy. The experimental group received additional FES therapy where two flaccid/paralyzed shoulder muscles (supraspinatus and posterior deltoid) were induced to contract repetitively up to 6 hours a day for 6 weeks. Duration of both the FES session and muscle contraction/relaxation ratio were progressively increased as performance improved. The experimental group showed significant improvements in arm function, electromyographic activity of the posterior deltoid, range of motion, and reduction in subluxation (as indicated by x-ray) compared with the control group. We concluded that the FES program was effective in reducing the severity of shoulder subluxation and pain, and possibly facilitating recovery of arm function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8291967

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil        ISSN: 0003-9993            Impact factor:   3.966


  25 in total

1.  Functional MRI determination of a dose-response relationship to lower extremity neuromuscular electrical stimulation in healthy subjects.

Authors:  Gerald V Smith; Gad Alon; Steven R Roys; Rao P Gullapalli
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-03-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 2.  Electrostimulation for promoting recovery of movement or functional ability after stroke.

Authors:  V M Pomeroy; L King; A Pollock; A Baily-Hallam; P Langhorne
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2006-04-19

3.  Role of deltoid and passives elements in stabilization during abduction motion (0 degrees-40 degrees): an ex vivo study.

Authors:  F Billuart; L Devun; W Skalli; D Mitton; O Gagey
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2008-07-09       Impact factor: 1.246

4.  Tolerance and conditioning to neuro-muscular electrical stimulation within and between sessions and gender.

Authors:  Gad Alon; Gerald V Smith
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

5.  The effect of electrical stimulation on impairment of the painful post-stroke shoulder.

Authors:  Victoria C Whitehair; John Chae; Terri Hisel; Richard D Wilson
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2019-07-12       Impact factor: 2.119

6.  The Effect of Peripheral Nerve Stimulation on Shoulder Biomechanics: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Comparison to Physical Therapy.

Authors:  Richard D Wilson; Jayme S Knutson; Maria E Bennett; John Chae
Journal:  Am J Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 2.159

7.  Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation for Treatment of Muscle Impairment: Critical Review and Recommendations for Clinical Practice.

Authors:  Ethne L Nussbaum; Pamela Houghton; Joseph Anthony; Sandy Rennie; Barbara L Shay; Alison M Hoens
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.037

8.  Hemiplegic shoulder pain--early prevention and rehabilitation.

Authors:  M C Kaplan
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-02

9.  Effect of intensive functional electrical stimulation therapy on upper-limb motor recovery after stroke: case study of a patient with chronic stroke.

Authors:  Noritaka Kawashima; Milos R Popovic; Vera Zivanovic
Journal:  Physiother Can       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.037

Review 10.  [Evidence-based arm rehabilitation--a systematic review of the literature].

Authors:  T Platz
Journal:  Nervenarzt       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 1.214

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.