Literature DB >> 24501553

Tolerance and conditioning to neuro-muscular electrical stimulation within and between sessions and gender.

Gad Alon1, Gerald V Smith2.   

Abstract

THIS STUDY WAS CONDUCTED TO DETERMINE: 1) If healthy subjects can be conditioned to tolerate clinically useful electrically induced muscle contraction; and 2) If there is a gender difference in response to such conditioning. Healthy volunteers (10 males, 11 females, mean age of 27.6 ± 5.8 yrs) were tested during each of 6 testing sessions. Maximal voluntary isometric contractions (MVIC) of the right quadriceps femoris (RQF) recorded by a computerized dynamometer. Electrical stimulation delivered through two surface electrodes and stimulation amplitude increased until the subject indicated to stop. After a 1 min rest the amplitude increased again to the same phase charge level, and the electrically induced contraction (EIC) was recorded by the dynamometer. Measurements of stimulation amplitude were repeated in each of 10 stimulation bouts per session. Measurements of EIC were repeated in session six. Statistical analyses included Multivariate ANOVAs, and Newman-Kuel's post-hoc tests (p < 0.01). Mean values of phase charge increased from session 1 to 6 for all subjects. Males tolerated significantly higher phase charge. The mean %MVIC torque generated by female subjects was initially only 11.2 ± 21.6% but reached 42.9 ± 25.4% at the end of the 6th session. Males' %MVIC torque values were significantly higher reaching 49.0 ± 41.6% and 73.5 ± 18.7% in the first and last trials respectively. Using the criterion that electrically induced contractions must be at least 25% of MVIC to be considered clinically useful, 36% of females were below this threshold at the end of the last session. In contrast, all males exceeded the 25% MVIC threshold at the end of the study. Most healthy subjects can be conditioned to electrical stimulation of the quadriceps, but depending on the criteria of therapeutic value and gender, some males and even more females may not reach the desired stimulation goal in 6 sessions. Females may require more conditioning sessions to reach contraction levels of therapeutic benefits. The reason(s) for the confounding factor of gender remains unknown. Key PointsNeuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) can strengthen skeletal musclesTolerance to NMES improves within 6 sessionsConditioning is a key to eliciting stronger contraction and to increasing the number of subjects that can benefit from NMESHealthy males can tolerate higher stimulusintensity and higher electrically induced quadriceps femoris contraction.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neuromuscular electrical stimulation; conditioning; gender; tolerance

Year:  2005        PMID: 24501553      PMCID: PMC3899655     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  49 in total

1.  Nerve stimulation with an electrode of finite size: differences between constant current and constant voltage stimulation.

Authors:  Mark M Stecker
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 4.589

2.  Introduction: Sex makes a difference: experimental and clinical pain responses.

Authors:  Gary B Rollman
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  2003 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.442

3.  Strength of the quadriceps femoris muscle and functional recovery after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A prospective, randomized clinical trial of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; A Delitto; S L Bailey; S W Stralka
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Effects of electrical stimulation on flexion contractures in the hemiplegic wrist.

Authors:  A D Pandyan; M H Granat; D J Stott
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.477

5.  Electrical stimulation of vastus medialis and stretching of lateral thigh muscles in patients with patello-femoral symptoms.

Authors:  S Werner; H Arvidsson; I Arvidsson; E Eriksson
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  Use of electrical stimulation to enhance recovery of quadriceps femoris muscle force production in patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  L Snyder-Mackler; A Delitto; S W Stralka; S L Bailey
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1994-10

7.  The effects of selected stimulus waveforms on pulse and phase characteristics at sensory and motor thresholds.

Authors:  G Kantor; G Alon; H S Ho
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1994-10

8.  Electrical stimulation-induced changes in skeletal muscle enzymes of men and women.

Authors:  J M Gauthier; R Thériault; G Thériault; Y Gélinas; J A Simoneau
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Normal trunk muscle strength and endurance in women and the effect of exercises and electrical stimulation. Part 1: Normal endurance and trunk muscle strength in 101 women.

Authors:  M Nordin; N Kahanovitz; R Verderame; M Parnianpour; S Yabut; K Viola; N Greenidge; M Mulvihill
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Rehabilitation of atrophied muscle in the rheumatoid arthritic hand: a comparison of two methods of electrical stimulation.

Authors:  J A Oldham; J K Stanley
Journal:  J Hand Surg Br       Date:  1989-08
View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Is high-frequency neuromuscular electrical stimulation a suitable tool for muscle performance improvement in both healthy humans and athletes?

Authors:  Julien Gondin; Patrick J Cozzone; David Bendahan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-09-10       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Comparison in muscle damage between maximal voluntary and electrically evoked isometric contractions of the elbow flexors.

Authors:  Marc Jubeau; Makii Muthalib; Guillaume Y Millet; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Kazunori Nosaka
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-05-15       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation on the Submental Area: The Relations of Biopsychological Factors with Maximum Amplitude Tolerance and Perceived Discomfort Level.

Authors:  Ali Barikroo; Karen Hegland; Giselle Carnaby; Donald Bolser; Todd Manini; Michael Crary
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2019-06-17       Impact factor: 3.438

4.  Long-term changes of stimulation intensities in hypoglossal nerve stimulation.

Authors:  Zhaojun Zhu; Benedikt Hofauer; Markus Wirth; Clemens Heiser
Journal:  J Clin Sleep Med       Date:  2020-10-15       Impact factor: 4.062

5.  Transcutaneous electrical stimulation on the anterior neck region: The impact of pulse duration and frequency on maximum amplitude tolerance and perceived discomfort.

Authors:  Ali Barikroo; Giselle Carnaby; Donald Bolser; Ronald Rozensky; Michael Crary
Journal:  J Oral Rehabil       Date:  2018-03-30       Impact factor: 3.837

6.  Aerobic neuromuscular electrical stimulation--an emerging technology to improve haemoglobin A1c in type 2 diabetes mellitus: results of a pilot study.

Authors:  Louis Crowe; Brian Caulfield
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Adjustment Effects of Maximum Intensity Tolerance During Whole-Body Electromyostimulation Training.

Authors:  Joshua Berger; Stephan Becker; Marco Backfisch; Christoph Eifler; Wolfgang Kemmler; Michael Fröhlich
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-07-24       Impact factor: 4.566

8.  Lab-based feasibility and acceptability of neuromuscular electrical stimulation in hip osteoarthritis rehabilitation.

Authors:  Louise C Burgess; Paul Taylor; Thomas W Wainwright; Ian D Swain
Journal:  J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng       Date:  2021-03-16

9.  A neuroprosthesis for tremor management through the control of muscle co-contraction.

Authors:  Juan Álvaro Gallego; Eduardo Rocon; Juan Manuel Belda-Lois; José Luis Pons
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2013-04-15       Impact factor: 4.262

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.