Literature DB >> 8291729

The effect of epidural versus general anesthesia on postoperative pain and analgesic requirements in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy.

Y Shir1, S N Raja, S M Frank.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although preemptive analgesia has been shown to decrease postinjury pain in animals, studies in humans have provided controversial results. The authors studied whether surgical epidural anesthesia with local anesthetics could affect postoperative pain and analgesic demands, when compared with general anesthesia.
METHODS: Male patients scheduled for radical retropubic prostatectomy were randomly assigned to receive epidural anesthesia only (EA, n = 34), combined epidural and general anesthesia (EG, n = 32), or general anesthesia only (GA, n = 30). A lumbar epidural catheter was inserted and tested in all patients. In the EA group, an induction dose of 0.25 ml/kg epidural bupivacaine (0.5%) was followed during surgery by a continuous infusion of 0.1 ml.kg-1.h-1 0.125% bupivacaine. In the EG group, 0.2 ml/kg epidural bupivacaine (0.5%) was injected after induction of general anesthesia but before surgery, followed by epidural infusion of 0.1 ml.kg-1.h-1 0.125% bupivacaine. In the GA group, anesthesia was maintained with morphine, isoflurane, and N2O. Epidural patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) was provided with bupivacaine and fentanyl for all patients in the postoperative period. Postoperative pain scores and analgesic requirements were examined and compared between groups every 4-8 h for 3-5 postoperative days.
RESULTS: Intraoperatively, EA patients received significantly more epidural bupivacaine than EG patients (129 +/- 6 mg vs. 98 +/- 6 mg, respectively. Recovery room median residual sensory level in EA patients (T6 +/- 2) was significantly higher than in EG patients (T10 +/- 2). PCA demand was greater in the GA and EG groups when compared with the EA group in postoperative days 2 (126 +/- 9 ml, 112 +/- 9 ml, 90 +/- 6 ml, respectively; P = 0.01) and 3 (89 +/- 10 ml, 83 +/- 9 ml, 48 +/- 5 respectively; P = 0.005). There was no difference in PCA demand between the GA and EG groups in the postoperative period. No significant clinical differences in postoperative mean pain scores were recorded in the first 5 days after surgery in the three anesthetic groups (range 0-2/10).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing lower abdominal surgery, the neuraxial blockade and surgical anesthesia achieved by epidural local anesthetics was associated with decreased postoperative analgesic demands. Lower postoperative analgesic requirements in the EA group, when compared with both the EG and GA groups, indicate that: (1) EA patients had less postoperative pain, and (2) an efficient intraoperative blockade of noxious afferent signals to the central nervous system is fundamental in reducing postoperative pain.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8291729     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199401000-00011

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  16 in total

Review 1.  Reduction of postoperative mortality and morbidity with epidural or spinal anaesthesia: results from overview of randomised trials.

Authors:  A Rodgers; N Walker; S Schug; A McKee; H Kehlet; A van Zundert; D Sage; M Futter; G Saville; T Clark; S MacMahon
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-12-16

2.  Epidural anesthesia during upper abdominal surgery provides better postoperative analgesia.

Authors:  T Yorozu; H Morisaki; M Kondoh; Y Toyoda; N Miyazawa; T Shigematsu
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 3.  Regional anaesthesia in the elderly: a clinical guide.

Authors:  Ban C H Tsui; Alese Wagner; Brendan Finucane
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.923

4.  Laparo-endoscopic single-site (LESS) cholecystectomy with epidural vs. general anesthesia.

Authors:  Sharona B Ross; Devanand Mangar; Rachel Karlnoski; Enrico Camporesi; Katheryne Downes; Kenneth Luberice; Krista Haines; Alexander S Rosemurgy
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-12-14       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 5.  Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia for preventing chronic pain after surgery.

Authors:  Michael H Andreae; Doerthe A Andreae
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-10-17

Review 6.  [Acute pain in adults, including perioperative pain management].

Authors:  A Tahmatzopoulos; O Moormann
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 7.  Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children.

Authors:  Erica J Weinstein; Jacob L Levene; Marc S Cohen; Doerthe A Andreae; Jerry Y Chao; Matthew Johnson; Charles B Hall; Michael H Andreae
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-06-20

8.  On kernel machine learning for propensity score estimation under complex confounding structures.

Authors:  Baiming Zou; Xinlei Mi; Patrick J Tighe; Gary G Koch; Fei Zou
Journal:  Pharm Stat       Date:  2021-02-22       Impact factor: 1.234

Review 9.  Local anaesthetics and regional anaesthesia versus conventional analgesia for preventing persistent postoperative pain in adults and children.

Authors:  Erica J Weinstein; Jacob L Levene; Marc S Cohen; Doerthe A Andreae; Jerry Y Chao; Matthew Johnson; Charles B Hall; Michael H Andreae
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-25

Review 10.  Optimal pain management for radical prostatectomy surgery: what is the evidence?

Authors:  Grish P Joshi; Thomas Jaschinski; Francis Bonnet; Henrik Kehlet
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2015-11-04       Impact factor: 2.217

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.