Literature DB >> 18057923

Effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion on children's perception and grasping.

Thomas Duemmler1, Volker H Franz, Bianca Jovanovic, Gudrun Schwarzer.   

Abstract

We investigated the development of the Ebbinghaus illusion in children's perception and grasping. A previous study (Hanisch et al. 2001) had reported negative illusion effects on 5- to 12-year-olds' grasping as compared to their perception. We attempted to replicate this finding and to test different hypotheses based on a direct influence of the context elements on the trajectories of the fingers which could explain this reversal of the illusion effects. For 5- to 7- and 9- to 11-year-olds we observed the classical illusion effects in perception. Illusion effects were perfectly similar for perception and grasping in 9- to 11-year-olds, while there was a non-significant trend toward smaller illusion effects in grasping for the 5- to 7-year-olds. This could be due to a slightly different effect of the illusion on younger children's grasping. However, it seems clear that there are no qualitative changes, as a reversal of the illusion effects in grasping of younger children. Finally, we show that our grasping data conform well to the motor literature for children's grasping, thereby strengthening our conclusions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18057923     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-007-1229-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  28 in total

Review 1.  A new view on grasping.

Authors:  J B Smeets; E Brenner
Journal:  Motor Control       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.422

2.  Are perception and action affected differently by the Titchener circles illusion?

Authors:  F Pavani; I Boscagli; F Benvenuti; M Rabuffetti; A Farnè
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Dynamic effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion in grasping: support for a planning/control model of action.

Authors:  Scott Glover; Peter Dixon
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  2002-02

4.  The effect of the Ebbinghaus illusion on grasping behaviour of children.

Authors:  C Hanisch; J Konczak; C Dohle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Grasp effects of the Ebbinghaus illusion: obstacle avoidance is not the explanation.

Authors:  V H Franz; H H Bülthoff; M Fahle
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-02-19       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Manual size estimation: a neuropsychological measure of perception?

Authors:  V H Franz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-07-08       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Development of prehension movements in children: a kinematic study.

Authors:  J P Kuhtz-Buschbeck; H Stolze; K Jöhnk; A Boczek-Funcke; M Illert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Size-contrast illusions deceive the eye but not the hand.

Authors:  S Aglioti; J F DeSouza; M A Goodale
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  1995-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

9.  Size contrast as a function of conceptual similarity between test and inducers.

Authors:  S Coren; J T Enns
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1993-11

10.  A comparison of the reach-to-grasp movement between children and adults: a kinematic study.

Authors:  Stefania Zoia; Eva Pezzetta; Laura Blason; Aldo Scabar; Marco Carrozzi; Maria Bulgheroni; Umberto Castiello
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 2.253

View more
  1 in total

1.  When illusions merge.

Authors:  Aline F Cretenoud; Gregory Francis; Michael H Herzog
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2020-08-03       Impact factor: 2.240

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.