Literature DB >> 8288429

Acquiring advanced technology. Decision-making strategies at twelve medical centers.

S N Weingart1.   

Abstract

This study describes decision making regarding the acquisition of technology in 12 major medical centers. The financial impact of a project was the most widely cited criterion of decision, but financial considerations were less important than either the impact of a technology on the quality of clinical care or its contribution to teaching and research. Rarely were criteria set out explicitly or in advance. Although exemplary models exist, the technology assessment process at most institutions is described as "political," "informal," or "ad hoc."

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8288429     DOI: 10.1017/s0266462300005456

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care        ISSN: 0266-4623            Impact factor:   2.188


  4 in total

1.  Hospital-based comparative effectiveness centers: translating research into practice to improve the quality, safety and value of patient care.

Authors:  Craig A Umscheid; Kendal Williams; Patrick J Brennan
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-08-10       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Medicare's policy on carotid stents limited use to hospitals meeting quality guidelines yet did not hurt disadvantaged.

Authors:  Peter W Groeneveld; Andrew J Epstein; Feifei Yang; Lin Yang; Daniel Polsky
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2011-02       Impact factor: 6.301

3.  Critical care medicine: extracorporeal oxygenation is feasible in Brazil?

Authors:  Rogério Zigaib; Danilo Teixeira Noritomi
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2014 Jul-Sep

4.  Evaluation of cost-effectiveness from the funding body's point of view of ultrasound-guided central venous catheter insertion compared with the conventional technique.

Authors:  Danilo Teixeira Noritomi; Rogério Zigaib; Otavio T Ranzani; Vanessa Teich
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.