Literature DB >> 21289353

Medicare's policy on carotid stents limited use to hospitals meeting quality guidelines yet did not hurt disadvantaged.

Peter W Groeneveld1, Andrew J Epstein, Feifei Yang, Lin Yang, Daniel Polsky.   

Abstract

Medicare began covering the use of carotid stents to treat arterial blockages in 2005 under an innovative policy requiring hospitals to meet quality-of-care benchmarks before seeking reimbursement. By restricting carotid stent provision to a smaller subset of US hospitals than those typically adopting new cardiovascular technologies, this policy could have disproportionately reduced the availability of this technology for minority, low-income, and rural patients. Such patients are often served by hospitals less able than others to meet increasingly stringent quality requirements. However, our analysis of hospitals that provided stents during 2005-07 demonstrated that although 21-38 percent fewer hospitals offered stents than offered other types of interventional cardiovascular procedures, such as heart bypass grafts, stents were no less available in localities with substantial poor, black, or rural populations than they were in other areas. Our study provides important evidence that the carotid stent coverage policy met its goal of limiting the adoption of the technology by hospitals that weren't well prepared to provide it-while still maintaining equitable availability of the technology. Therefore, it may be a useful model for future Medicare coverage decisions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21289353      PMCID: PMC3164858          DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.2010.0320

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  33 in total

1.  Evidence-based coverage policy.

Authors:  A M Garber
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 6.301

2.  Economics, values, and health care reform.

Authors:  V R Fuchs
Journal:  Am Econ Rev       Date:  1996-03

3.  Hospital adoption of medical technology: an empirical test of alternative models.

Authors:  J D Teplensky; M V Pauly; J R Kimberly; A L Hillman; J S Schwartz
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Variations in the use of medical and surgical services by the Medicare population.

Authors:  M R Chassin; R H Brook; R E Park; J Keesey; A Fink; J Kosecoff; K Kahn; N Merrick; D H Solomon
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-01-30       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  X-ray CT and magnetic resonance imagers. Diffusion patterns and policy issues.

Authors:  E P Steinberg; J E Sisk; K E Locke
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1985-10-03       Impact factor: 91.245

6.  Acquiring advanced technology. Decision-making strategies at twelve medical centers.

Authors:  S N Weingart
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.188

7.  The dynamics of technological change in medicine.

Authors:  A Gelijns; N Rosenberg
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 6.301

8.  Carotid artery stenting compared with endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic carotid stenosis (International Carotid Stenting Study): an interim analysis of a randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Jörg Ederle; Joanna Dobson; Roland L Featherstone; Leo H Bonati; H Bart van der Worp; Gert J de Borst; T Hauw Lo; Peter Gaines; Paul J Dorman; Sumaira Macdonald; Philippe A Lyrer; Johanna M Hendriks; Charles McCollum; Paul J Nederkoorn; Martin M Brown
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-02-25       Impact factor: 79.321

9.  Protected carotid-artery stenting versus endarterectomy in high-risk patients.

Authors:  Jay S Yadav; Mark H Wholey; Richard E Kuntz; Pierre Fayad; Barry T Katzen; Gregory J Mishkel; Tanvir K Bajwa; Patrick Whitlow; Neil E Strickman; Michael R Jaff; Jeffrey J Popma; David B Snead; Donald E Cutlip; Brian G Firth; Kenneth Ouriel
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2004-10-07       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Racial variations in the rates of carotid angiography and endarterectomy in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack.

Authors:  E Z Oddone; R D Horner; M E Monger; D B Matchar
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1993-12-27
View more
  6 in total

1.  Impact of alternative medical device approval processes on costs and health.

Authors:  Benjamin P George; Vinayak Venkataraman; E Ray Dorsey; S Claiborne Johnston
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 4.689

2.  Regional variation in patient selection and treatment for carotid artery disease in the Vascular Quality Initiative.

Authors:  Katie E Shean; John C McCallum; Peter A Soden; Sarah E Deery; Joseph R Schneider; Brian W Nolan; Caron B Rockman; Marc L Schermerhorn
Journal:  J Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-03-27       Impact factor: 4.268

3.  Socioeconomic Inequalities in the Utilization of Colorectal Stents for the Treatment of Malignant Bowel Obstruction.

Authors:  Philip N Okafor; Derrick J Stobaugh; Louis M Wong Kee Song; Paul J Limburg; Jayant A Talwalkar
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2016-01-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  A comparison of clinical outcomes from carotid artery stenting among US hospitals.

Authors:  Andrew J Epstein; Lin Yang; Feifei Yang; Peter W Groeneveld
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2014-06-03

5.  Utilization of Advanced Cardiovascular Therapies in the United States and Canada: An Observational Study of New York and Ontario Administrative Data.

Authors:  Peter Cram; Saket Girotra; John Matelski; Maria Koh; Bruce E Landon; Lu Han; Douglas S Lee; Dennis T Ko
Journal:  Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes       Date:  2020-01-20

6.  Understanding and benchmarking health service achievement of policy goals for chronic disease.

Authors:  Erica Bell; Bastian Seidel
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-09-29       Impact factor: 2.655

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.