Literature DB >> 8287751

Radical abdominopelvic lymphadenectomy: historic perspective and current role in the surgical management of rectal cancer.

J R Harnsberger1, V M Vernava, W E Longo.   

Abstract

Radical abdominopelvic lymphadenectomy for rectal cancer is based on the tenet that removal of all potentially involved lymphatic tissue will yield a lower rate of locoregional failure and improve survival. At centers with extensive experience with the procedure, the operating time is only modestly prolonged compared with conventional resection. Blood loss and postoperative hospitalization are not significantly increased. Urinary dysfunction and impotence associated with radical abdominopelvic lymphadenectomy (as high as 80 percent and 76 percent, respectively, in recent series) have been major deterrents to its more routine application. Preservation of the hypogastric plexus and even selective preservation of a unilateral S4 nerve root have been shown to reduce the occurrence of genitourinary complications. Improved five-year survival of 68 percent and local recurrence rates of 5 to 20 percent for TNM Stage III cancers have been achieved with radical abdominopelvic lymphadenectomy. These results compare favorably with recent trials of adjuvant chemoradiation after conventional resection in stage-matched patients. The rationale, evolution, and application of radical abdominopelvic lymphadenectomy to the surgical management of rectal cancer are critically examined. The potential benefits of radical abdominopelvic lymphadenectomy, which have been demonstrated in nonrandomized trials, should be evaluated in a prospective and properly randomized study to clearly establish or refute its efficacy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8287751     DOI: 10.1007/BF02047218

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  10 in total

1.  Lateral lymph node dissection for lower rectal cancer.

Authors:  T Nakamura; M Watanabe
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Injection of methylene blue solution into the inferior mesenteric artery of resected rectal specimens for rectal cancer as a method for increasing the lymph node harvest.

Authors:  E Klepšytė; N Evaldas Samalavičius
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2012-03-17       Impact factor: 3.781

3.  Sphincter-sparing surgery for adenocarcinoma of the distal 3 cm of the true rectum: results after neoadjuvant therapy and minimally invasive radical surgery or local excision.

Authors:  John Marks; George Nassif; Henry Schoonyoung; Al DeNittis; Eric Zeger; Mohammed Mohiuddin; Gerald Marks
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-09-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  Analysis of local recurrence rates after surgery alone for rectal cancer.

Authors:  J L McCall; M R Cox; D A Wattchow
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Adjuvant and neoadjuvant treatment of resectable, locally advanced, rectal carcinoma with radiation therapy and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Roland B Hawkins
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  2002

6.  Neoadjuvant chemoradiation for rectal cancer: analysis of clinical outcomes from a 13-year institutional experience.

Authors:  M W Onaitis; R B Noone; M Hartwig; H Hurwitz; M Morse; P Jowell; K McGrath; C Lee; M S Anscher; B Clary; C Mantyh; T N Pappas; K Ludwig; H F Seigler; D S Tyler
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Anemia and long-term outcome in adjuvant and neoadjuvant radiochemotherapy of stage II and III rectal adenocarcinoma: the Freiburg experience (1989-2002).

Authors:  Christian Weissenberger; Michael Geissler; Florian Otto; Annette Barke; Karl Henne; Georg von Plehn; Alex Rein; Christine Muller; Susanne Bartelt; Michael Henke
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Regional lymph node metastasis and locoregional recurrence of rectal carcinoma in the era of TME [corrected] surgery. Implications for treatment decisions.

Authors:  Paul Hermanek; Susanne Merkel; Rainer Fietkau; Claus Rödel; Werner Hohenberger
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2009-12-10       Impact factor: 2.571

9.  A study into methodology and application of quantification of tumour vasculature in rectal cancer.

Authors:  Femke Vlems; Erik van der Worp; Jeroen van der Laak; Cornelis van de Velde; Iris Nagtegaal; Han van Krieken
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2004-05-28       Impact factor: 4.064

10.  A Prospective Observational Study Comparing Long-Course Conventional Neoadjuvant Chemoradiotherapy with Short-Course Radiotherapy Followed by Consolidation Chemotherapy with Delayed Surgery in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer.

Authors:  Niketa Thakur; Rajeev K Seam; Manoj K Gupta; Manish Gupta; Vikas Fotedar; Siddharth Vats; Sakshi Rana; Poorva Vias; Rachit Ahuja
Journal:  South Asian J Cancer       Date:  2020-12-14
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.