Literature DB >> 8286589

Nuclear-cytoplasmic interactions during the first cell cycle of nuclear transfer reconstructed bovine embryos: implications for deoxyribonucleic acid replication and development.

K H Campbell1, W A Ritchie, I Wilmut.   

Abstract

The present study investigated the decay of maturation-promoting factor (MPF) activity in electrically activated in vitro-matured bovine oocytes and examined the influence of the cell cycle stage of both the donor nucleus and the recipient cytoplasm upon the morphology and DNA synthesis potential of the donor nucleus in reconstructed embryos. The decay of MPF activity was studied both biochemically in electrically activated in vitro-matured oocytes and by morphological examination of nuclear structure in reconstructed bovine embryos. As measured by H1 kinase activity in groups of 10 oocytes, the level of MPF declined rapidly to 30 +/- 4% (of the maximum level in unactivated control oocytes) at 60 min and reached a basal level of 20 +/- 6% at 120 min. This level of activity was then maintained until at least 9 h postactivation. In contrast, when MPF activity was assayed by morphological examination of nuclei in individual reconstructed embryos, the decline in activity occurred over a period of 9 h postactivation. DNA synthesis of nuclei arrested at the G1/S border and in G2 phases of the cell cycle was examined in embryos reconstructed at the time of oocyte activation, i.e., when MPF levels were maximal, and by fusion 10 h postactivation, when no MPF activity could be detected. All nuclei transferred at the time of oocyte activation underwent nuclear envelope breakdown (NEBD) and subsequent DNA synthesis. However, when nuclei were transferred 10 h after activation, no NEBD was observed in any nuclei. Nuclei arrested at the G1/S border or nuclei in S phase when transferred in the absence of NEBD underwent DNA synthesis, while no DNA synthesis was observed in G2 nuclei transferred into this cytoplasmic environment. The results presented show that all nuclei, regardless of cell cycle stage, undergo DNA replication when transplanted into metaphase II (MeII) cytoplasts in which MPF activity is high. From these observations we would suggest that one factor that may contribute to the present low frequency of development of bovine nuclear transfer embryos is the ploidy of the reconstructed embryo after the first cell cycle. In order to maintain correct ploidy of the reconstructed embryo, only G1 nuclei should be transferred at the time of activation, when MPF levels are high. In contrast, when the integrity of the nuclear membrane is maintained by transfer at 10 h postactivation, when MPF activity is absent, the rereplication of G2 nuclei is prevented and correct ploidy of the reconstructed embryo may be maintained.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8286589     DOI: 10.1095/biolreprod49.5.933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Reprod        ISSN: 0006-3363            Impact factor:   4.285


  10 in total

Review 1.  Somatic cell nuclear transfer: origins, the present position and future opportunities.

Authors:  Ian Wilmut; Yu Bai; Jane Taylor
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2015-10-19       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 2.  Cycling through developmental decisions: how cell cycle dynamics control pluripotency, differentiation and reprogramming.

Authors:  Abdenour Soufi; Stephen Dalton
Journal:  Development       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.868

Review 3.  A background to nuclear transfer and its applications in agriculture and human therapeutic medicine.

Authors:  Keith H S Campbell
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  Somatic cell nuclear transfer efficiency: how can it be improved through nuclear remodeling and reprogramming?

Authors:  Kristin M Whitworth; Randall S Prather
Journal:  Mol Reprod Dev       Date:  2010-10-07       Impact factor: 2.609

5.  Production of identical sextuplet mice by transferring metaphase nuclei from four-cell embryos.

Authors:  O Y Kwon; T Kono
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-11-12       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Culture, characteristics and chromosome complement of Siberian tiger fibroblasts for nuclear transfer.

Authors:  Jimei Song; Song Hua; Kai Song; Yong Zhang
Journal:  In Vitro Cell Dev Biol Anim       Date:  2007-09-01       Impact factor: 2.416

7.  Cloned blastocysts produced by nuclear transfer from somatic cells in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fascicularis).

Authors:  Junko Okahara-Narita; Hideaki Tsuchiya; Tatsuyuki Takada; Ryuzo Torii
Journal:  Primates       Date:  2007-01-12       Impact factor: 1.781

8.  Development of porcine embryos reconstituted with somatic cells and enucleated metaphase I and II oocytes matured in a protein-free medium.

Authors:  K Miyoshi; S J Rzucidlo; J R Gibbons; S Arat; S L Stice
Journal:  BMC Dev Biol       Date:  2001-07-11       Impact factor: 1.978

Review 9.  25th ANNIVERSARY OF CLONING BY SOMATIC-CELL NUCLEAR TRANSFER: Nuclear transfer and the development of genetically modified/gene edited livestock.

Authors:  Ramiro Alberio; Eckhard Wolf
Journal:  Reproduction       Date:  2021-06-11       Impact factor: 3.906

10.  The acetyllysine reader BRD3R promotes human nuclear reprogramming and regulates mitosis.

Authors:  Zhicheng Shao; Ruowen Zhang; Alireza Khodadadi-Jamayran; Bo Chen; Michael R Crowley; Muhamad A Festok; David K Crossman; Tim M Townes; Kejin Hu
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 14.919

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.