Literature DB >> 8286201

Combined evaluation of preoperative serum sialyl-Tn antigen and carcinoembryonic antigen levels is prognostic for gastric cancer patients.

I Takahashi1, Y Maehara, T Kusumoto, S Kohnoe, Y Kakeji, H Baba, K Sugimachi.   

Abstract

We have found that elevation of preoperative serum sialyl-Tn antigen (STN) levels is associated with a poor prognosis for gastric cancer patients, and these high levels remain in the advanced stage of the disease. We have now examined findings with the combined assay of STN and carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels with regard to prediction of the prognosis of gastric cancer patients. Serum CEA levels and STN levels were determined preoperatively in 349 Japanese patients with gastric cancer. The patients were divided into four groups: (A) the CEA (-) STN (-) group (CEA < or = 5 ng ml-1, STN < or = 45 U ml-1, n = 286); (B) the CEA (-) STN (+) group (CEA < or = 5 ng ml-1, STN > 45 U ml-1, n = 31); (C) the CEA (+) STN (-) group (CEA > 5 ng ml-1, STN < or = 45 U ml-1, n = 17); and (D) the CEA (+) STN (+) group (CEA > 5 ng ml-1, STN > 45 U ml-1, n = 15). Clinicopathological features and the prognosis of these groups were examined. The distribution of two markers showed no significant correlation. The patients in the CEA (+) STN (+) group (group D) had more advanced disease than the patients in CEA (-) STN (-) group (group A); tumour size was larger, serosal invasion was prominent, lymphatic and vascular involvement was frequent and the tumour was more infiltrative. Lymph node metastasis and hepatic metastasis were more common. Total gastrectomy was usually performed, and the non-curative rate was higher. The 5-year survival of patients in the CEA (+) STN (+) (group D) was 14.5 +/- 9.5%, that is lower than that of patients in any other group [CEA (+) STN (-) (group C) 44.1 +/- 12.7% (P < 0.05); CEA (-) STN (+) (group B) 60.1 +/- 9.5% (P > 0.05); CEA (-) STN (-) (group A) 77.6 +/- 9.5% (P < 0.05)]. This combined assay of these markers will aid in estimating the prognosis and selecting appropriate drugs and care for gastric cancer patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8286201      PMCID: PMC1968791          DOI: 10.1038/bjc.1994.27

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Cancer        ISSN: 0007-0920            Impact factor:   7.640


  19 in total

1.  New carbohydrate tumor markers.

Authors:  S H Itzkowitz; Y S Kim
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  1986-02       Impact factor: 22.682

2.  Expression of Tn, sialosyl-Tn, and T antigens in human colon cancer.

Authors:  S H Itzkowitz; M Yuan; C K Montgomery; T Kjeldsen; H K Takahashi; W L Bigbee; Y S Kim
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1989-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Serum CEA levels facilitate detection of recurrences of cancer in patients after gastrectomy.

Authors:  R Tamada; Y Hiramoto; S Tsujitani; T Nozuka; T Okamura; H Masuda; K Sugimachi; K Inokuchi
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1985-01

4.  Carcinoembryonic antigen in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  N Shimizu; T Wakatsuki; A Murakami; H Yoshioka; R Hamazoe; H Kanayama; M Maeta; S Koga
Journal:  Oncology       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.935

5.  The usefulness of CEA as an indicator for early detection and a guide to the treatment of recurrent gastric cancer.

Authors:  T Kano; T Koga; K Souda; Y Abe; T Yonemura; N Oka; K Inokuchi
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1987-07

6.  Serial determinations of carcinoembryonic antigen for early detection of recurrent gastric cancer.

Authors:  R Tamada; Y Hiramoto; Y Abe; T Nouzuka; T Okamura; H Masuda; T Kano; R Kumashiro; K Inokuchi
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1982

7.  Evaluation of Ca 12-5 as a tumor marker for gastric and colo-rectal cancer in comparison to CEA and Ca 19-9.

Authors:  A Quentmeier; P Schlag; H P Geisen; H Schmidt-Gayk
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  1987-06       Impact factor: 4.424

8.  The clinical usefulness of preoperative CEA determination in gastric cancer.

Authors:  T Koga; T Kano; K Souda; N Oka; K Inokuchi
Journal:  Jpn J Surg       Date:  1987-09

9.  Preparation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies directed to the tumor-associated O-linked sialosyl-2----6 alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminyl (sialosyl-Tn) epitope.

Authors:  T Kjeldsen; H Clausen; S Hirohashi; T Ogawa; H Iijima; S Hakomori
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1988-04-15       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Effect of surgical removal on the growth and kinetics of residual tumor.

Authors:  N Gunduz; B Fisher; E A Saffer
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 12.701

View more
  5 in total

1.  Glycosylations versus conformational preferences of cancer associated mucin core.

Authors:  J Schuman; D Qiu; R R Koganty; B M Longenecker; A P Campbell
Journal:  Glycoconj J       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.916

Review 2.  Regulation of the metastatic cell phenotype by sialylated glycans.

Authors:  Matthew J Schultz; Amanda F Swindall; Susan L Bellis
Journal:  Cancer Metastasis Rev       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 9.264

Review 3.  Clinical significance of serum tumor markers for gastric cancer: a systematic review of literature by the Task Force of the Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Tamaki Noie; Manabu Ohashi; Koji Oba; Yutaka Takahashi
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2013-04-10       Impact factor: 7.370

4.  The prognostic significance of pretreatment serum CEA levels in gastric cancer: a meta-analysis including 14651 patients.

Authors:  Kai Deng; Li Yang; Bing Hu; Hao Wu; Hong Zhu; Chengwei Tang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-04-16       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Correlation between sialyl Tn antigen and lymphatic metastasis in patients with Borrmann type IV gastric carcinoma.

Authors:  Y Kakeji; Y Maehara; M Morita; A Matsukuma; M Furusawa; I Takahashi; T Kusumoto; S Ohno; K Sugimachi
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1995-01       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.