PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of lossy image (noninvertible) compression on diagnostic accuracy of thoracic computed tomographic images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty images from patients with mediastinal adenopathy and pulmonary nodules were compressed to six different levels with tree-structured vector quantization. Three radiologists then used the original and compressed images for diagnosis. Unlike many previous receiver operating characteristic-based studies that used confidence rankings and binary detection tasks, this study examined the sensitivity and predictive value positive scores from nonbinary detection tasks. RESULTS: At the 5% significance level, there was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy of image assessment at compression rates of up to 9:1. CONCLUSION: The techniques presented for evaluation of image quality do not depend on the specific compression algorithm and provide a useful approach to evaluation of the benefits of any lossy image processing technique.
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effects of lossy image (noninvertible) compression on diagnostic accuracy of thoracic computed tomographic images. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty images from patients with mediastinal adenopathy and pulmonary nodules were compressed to six different levels with tree-structured vector quantization. Three radiologists then used the original and compressed images for diagnosis. Unlike many previous receiver operating characteristic-based studies that used confidence rankings and binary detection tasks, this study examined the sensitivity and predictive value positive scores from nonbinary detection tasks. RESULTS: At the 5% significance level, there was no statistically significant difference in diagnostic accuracy of image assessment at compression rates of up to 9:1. CONCLUSION: The techniques presented for evaluation of image quality do not depend on the specific compression algorithm and provide a useful approach to evaluation of the benefits of any lossy image processing technique.
Authors: Jane P Ko; Jeffrey Chang; Elan Bomsztyk; James S Babb; David P Naidich; Henry Rusinek Journal: Radiology Date: 2005-08-26 Impact factor: 11.105
Authors: G Luccichenti; F Cademartiri; A Pichiecchio; E Bontempi; U Sabatini; S Bastianello Journal: J Digit Imaging Date: 2009-07-15 Impact factor: 4.056