Literature DB >> 8284291

Women's opinions on the offer and use of maternal serum screening.

E E Roelofsen1, L I Kamerbeek, T J Tymstra, J R Beekhuis, A Mantingh.   

Abstract

We studied the opinions and experiences concerning maternal serum screening of two groups of women: (A) women who were not eligible for prenatal diagnosis; and (B) women for whom prenatal diagnosis was available because of advanced maternal age, and who either underwent chorionic villus sampling or amniocentesis. Many of the women were in favour of the availability of serum screening and would apply for this test in a future pregnancy. This applied also to many respondents who had previously undergone prenatal diagnosis. Most of these women, however, did not intend to decline diagnostic amniocentesis if the screening results did not indicate an increased risk. The majority of the group of respondents of 36 years and over did not consider it acceptable if age indication was dropped altogether. A system based on serum screening will have other implications than a policy based on age indication, since specific individual risk assessment is perceived as being of more significance than a risk statistically derived from age alone. Serum screening is often seen as a means of reassurance and many women are not aware of the possible drawbacks. As technology becomes increasingly complicated, counselling has to be adjusted correspondingly. Further research is needed to establish whether and how distress can be minimized and well-considered individual choice can be achieved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Empirical Approach; Genetics and Reproduction

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8284291     DOI: 10.1002/pd.1970130808

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prenat Diagn        ISSN: 0197-3851            Impact factor:   3.050


  5 in total

1.  Attitudes toward maternal serum screening in Chinese women with positive results.

Authors:  Sheau-Wen Jan; Chih-Ping Chen; Lian-Hua Huang; Fu-Yuan Huang; Chung-Chi Lan
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 2.537

2.  Pregnancy planning guide. Evidence-based information for prospective parents.

Authors:  Krista M Maier; Colleen M Kirkham; Elizabeth Lim; Ka Wai Cheung; Stefan Grzybowski
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.275

3.  Informed choice of pregnant women in prenatal screening tests for Down's syndrome.

Authors:  H-H Chiang; Y-M Yu Chao; Y-S Yuh
Journal:  J Med Ethics       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.903

4.  Women's experience of maternal serum screening.

Authors:  J C Carroll; J B Brown; A J Reid; P Pugh
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 3.275

5.  Explaining variation in Down's syndrome screening uptake: comparing the Netherlands with England and Denmark using documentary analysis and expert stakeholder interviews.

Authors:  Neeltje M T H Crombag; Ynke E Vellinga; Sandra A Kluijfhout; Louise D Bryant; Pat A Ward; Rita Iedema-Kuiper; Peter C J I Schielen; Jozien M Bensing; Gerard H A Visser; Ann Tabor; Janet Hirst
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-25       Impact factor: 2.655

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.