Literature DB >> 8282152

The incidence and outcome of rectal bleeding in general practice.

G H Fijten1, J W Muris, R Starmans, J A Knottnerus, G H Blijham, T F Krebber.   

Abstract

The objective of the studies reported in this paper was to determine the incidence as well as the final diagnostic outcome of rectal bleeding presenting in general practice. Because of the wide variety observed in incidence rates among 83 general practitioners (GPs) in the first study (A) an additional study (B) was undertaken. In study B with 10 GPs special efforts were made to maximize the catchment rate. The mean 'consultation incidence rate' was 7 per 1000 people per year. A follow-up period of at least 1 year was applied to establish the final diagnostic conclusion. Occurrence of colorectal cancer was found in 3% of patients with rectal bleeding. This may represent an overestimation of the prior probability since there was a selection in favour of patients with clinically relevant rectal bleeding. In about 90% of patients rectal bleeding was related to minor ailments or self-limiting disorders. Further study on predictive values of (combinations of) other signs and symptoms is necessary to develop clinical recommendations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8282152     DOI: 10.1093/fampra/10.3.283

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fam Pract        ISSN: 0263-2136            Impact factor:   2.267


  11 in total

1.  Rectal bleeding and colorectal cancer. Inclusion criteria of study need clarification.

Authors:  T Fahey; A Montgomery; K Schroeder
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-03-10

2.  GPs can separate oncological wheat from chaff.

Authors:  William T Hamilton; Alison P Round; Deborah Sharp; Tim Peters
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-02-15

3.  Factors identifying higher risk rectal bleeding in general practice.

Authors:  Brian G Ellis; Michael R Thompson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.386

4.  Incidence and causes of rectal bleeding in general practice as detected by colonoscopy.

Authors:  J V Metcalf; J Smith; R Jones; C O Record
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 5.386

5.  Diagnostic work-up of rectal bleeding in general practice.

Authors:  Christoph Heintze; Dorothea Matysiak-Klose; Thorsten Kröhn; Ute Wolf; Alexander Brand; Christoph Meisner; Imma Fischer; Hartwig Wehrmeyer; Vittoria Braun
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.386

6.  Predicting colorectal cancer risk in patients with rectal bleeding.

Authors:  Roma Robertson; Christine Campbell; David P Weller; Rob Elton; David Mant; John Primrose; Karen Nugent; Una Macleod; Rita Sharma
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 5.386

7.  Endoscopy for hematochezia in patients under 50 years of age.

Authors:  J D Lewis; C E Shih; D Blecker
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 8.  Cancer diagnosis in primary care.

Authors:  William Hamilton
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 5.386

9.  The evaluation of rectal bleeding in adults. A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing four diagnostic strategies.

Authors:  Elizabeth Allen; Christina Nicolaidis; Mark Helfand
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  Rectal bleeding and previous anticoagulant treatment in patients with colorectal cancer do not predict outcome.

Authors:  B Kirshtein; S Ariad; S Mizrahi; S Man; S Walfisch
Journal:  Tech Coloproctol       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 3.781

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.