Literature DB >> 8276232

Parental imprinting on the mouse X chromosome: effects on the early development of X0, XXY and XXX embryos.

T Tada1, N Takagi, I D Adler.   

Abstract

To examine the effects of X-chromosome imprinting during early mouse embryogenesis, we attempted to produce XM0, XP0, XMXMY, XMXPY and XMXMXP (where XM and XP stand for the maternally and the paternally derived X chromosome, respectively) making use of mouse strains bearing the translocation Rb(X.2)2Ad and the inversion In(X)1H. Unlike XMXPY embryos, XMXMY and XMXMXP conceptuses suffered from severe growth retardation or abnormal development characterized by deficient extra-embryonic structures at 6.5-7.5 days post coitum (dpc). A cytogenetic study suggested that two XM chromosomes remaining active in certain nonepiblast cells were responsible for the serious developmental abnormality found in these embryos disomic for XM. Although matings involving females heterozygous for Rb(X.2)Ad hinted at the paucity of XP0 embryos relative to those having the complementary karyotype of XMXMXP, further study of embryos from matings between females heterozygous for In(X)1H and Rb2Ad males did not substantiate this observation. Thus, the extensive peri-implantation loss of XP0 embryos shown by Hunt (1991) may be confined to X0 mothers. Taken together, this study failed to reveal a parentally imprinted X-linked gene essential for early mouse embryogenesis other than the one most probably corresponding to the X-chromosome inactivation centre.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8276232     DOI: 10.1017/s0016672300031736

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genet Res        ISSN: 0016-6723            Impact factor:   1.588


  9 in total

1.  Paternal transmission of X-linked placental dysplasia in mouse interspecific hybrids.

Authors:  U Zechner; M Reule; P S Burgoyne; A Schubert; A Orth; H Hameister; R Fundele
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 2.  Epigenesis and plasticity of mouse trophoblast stem cells.

Authors:  Julie Prudhomme; Céline Morey
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-11-05       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  The parent-of-origin of the extra X chromosome may differentially affect psychopathology in Klinefelter syndrome.

Authors:  Hilgo Bruining; Sophie van Rijn; Hanna Swaab; Jacques Giltay; Wendy Kates; Martien J H Kas; Herman van Engeland; Leo de Sonneville
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2010-10-29       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 4.  What makes the maternal X chromosome resistant to undergoing imprinted X inactivation?

Authors:  Takashi Sado
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-05       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  The effects of age and abnormal sperm count on the nondisjunction of spermatozoa.

Authors:  H Asada; K Sueoka; T Hashiba; M Kuroshima; N Kobayashi; Y Yoshimura
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 3.412

6.  The asymmetry of female meiosis reduces the frequency of inheritance of unpaired chromosomes.

Authors:  Daniel B Cortes; Karen L McNally; Paul E Mains; Francis J McNally
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 8.140

Review 7.  Mechanisms of Choice in X-Chromosome Inactivation.

Authors:  Giulia Furlan; Rafael Galupa
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2022-02-03       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 8.  Long noncoding RNAs in imprinting and X chromosome inactivation.

Authors:  Joseph M Autuoro; Stephan P Pirnie; Gordon G Carmichael
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2014-01-07

9.  Antagonist Xist and Tsix co-transcription during mouse oogenesis and maternal Xist expression during pre-implantation development calls into question the nature of the maternal imprint on the X chromosome.

Authors:  Jane Lynda Deuve; Amélie Bonnet-Garnier; Nathalie Beaujean; Philip Avner; Céline Morey
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.528

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.