Literature DB >> 8275417

Clinicopathologic differences between carcinoma in the gastric remnant stump after distal partial gastrectomy for benign gastroduodenal lesions and primary carcinoma in the upper third of the stomach.

M Ikeguchi1, A Kondou, S Shibata, H Yamashiro, S Tsujitani, M Maeta, N Kaibara.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: This study evaluated the prognosis of patients with carcinoma in the gastric remnant stump after distal gastrectomy for benign disease (stump cancer).
METHODS: Twenty patients with resected stump cancer were studied and compared with 266 patients with resected primary cancer in the upper third of the stomach (primary cancer).
RESULTS: The percentages of lymph nodes with metastases located at the lesser curvature and the left gastric artery, respectively, were 50.0% and 25.2% in patients with primary cancer and 15.0% and 5.0% in patients with stump cancer. In patients with remnant gastric cancer, lymph node metastases at jejunal mesentery near anastomotic site were found in 2 of 20 (10.0%). The 5-year survival rates were 62.1% and 52.5% for patients with curatively resected primary cancer (n = 203) and stump cancer (n = 17), respectively, and there was no statistical difference between the two groups. There was a distinct difference in terms of patterns of recurrence between patients with curatively resected primary cancer and those with stump cancer. The percentages of peritoneal and hematogenic metastases, respectively, were 40.6% and 31.3% in primary cancer and 0% and 83.3% in stump cancers.
CONCLUSION: The lymph flow from the remnant stomach seems to be changed by the initial operation, and as a result, in stump cancer, metastatic lymph nodes are located at different places from those associated with primary cancer. Even when curative surgery is performed in patients with stump cancer, it is important to follow up patients and check for possible metastasis to the liver.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8275417     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19940101)73:1<15::aid-cncr2820730105>3.0.co;2-j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  13 in total

1.  Effects of initial disease status on lymph flow following gastrectomy in cases of carcinoma in the remnant stomach.

Authors:  Shinsaku Honda; Etsuro Bando; Rie Makuuchi; Masanori Tokunaga; Yutaka Tanizawa; Taiichi Kawamura; Teiichi Sugiura; Yusuke Kinugasa; Katsuhiko Uesaka; Masanori Terashima
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2016-09-16       Impact factor: 7.370

2.  Early gastric stump cancer following distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  K Kaneko; H Kondo; D Saito; K Shirao; H Yamaguchi; T Yokota; G Yamao; T Sano; M Sasako; S Yoshida
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 23.059

3.  Comparison of total versus subtotal gastrectomy for remnant gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hironobu Goto; Shingo Kanaji; Dai Otsubo; Taro Oshikiri; Masashi Yamamoto; Tetsu Nakamura; Satoshi Suzuki; Yasuhiro Fujino; Masahiro Tominaga; Yoshihiro Kakeji
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Clinicopathological characteristics and survival difference between gastric stump carcinoma and primary upper third gastric cancer.

Authors:  Masanori Tokunaga; Takeshi Sano; Shigekazu Ohyama; Naoki Hiki; Tetsu Fukunaga; Kazuhiko Yamada; Toshiharu Yamaguchi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-12-12       Impact factor: 3.452

5.  Outcomes for patients following hepatic resection of metastatic tumors from gastric cancer.

Authors:  Hironori Tsujimoto; Takashi Ichikura; Satoshi Ono; Hidekazu Sugasawa; Shuichi Hiraki; Naoko Sakamoto; Yoshihisa Yaguchi; Kazuo Hatsuse; Junji Yamamoto; Kazuo Hase
Journal:  Hepatol Int       Date:  2010-01-29       Impact factor: 6.047

Review 6.  Gastric cancer arising from the remnant stomach after distal gastrectomy: a review.

Authors:  Shinsuke Takeno; Tatsuya Hashimoto; Kenji Maki; Ryosuke Shibata; Hironari Shiwaku; Ippei Yamana; Risako Yamashita; Yuichi Yamashita
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 7.  Current status in remnant gastric cancer after distal gastrectomy.

Authors:  Masaichi Ohira; Takahiro Toyokawa; Katsunobu Sakurai; Naoshi Kubo; Hiroaki Tanaka; Kazuya Muguruma; Masakazu Yashiro; Naoyoshi Onoda; Kosei Hirakawa
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Gastric remnant cancer: an old problem with novel concerns.

Authors:  Ozgur Firat; Adem Guler; Murat Sozbilen; Sinan Ersin; Hasan Kaplan
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2008-07-08       Impact factor: 3.445

9.  Minimally invasive surgery for remnant gastric cancer: a comparison with open surgery.

Authors:  In Gyu Kwon; In Cho; Ali Guner; Yoon Young Choi; Hyun Beak Shin; Hyoung-Il Kim; Ji Yeong An; Jae-Ho Cheong; Sung Hoon Noh; Woo Jin Hyung
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Does remnant gastric cancer really differ from primary gastric cancer? A systematic review of the literature by the Task Force of Japanese Gastric Cancer Association.

Authors:  Hideaki Shimada; Takeo Fukagawa; Yoshio Haga; Koji Oba
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-12-14       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.