Literature DB >> 8274927

Minimally invasive surgery. Implications for hospitals, health workers, and patients.

H D Banta1.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive surgery is one of the great innovations of health care in the 20th century. It promises to revolutionise surgery by allowing many more operations to be performed with minimal hospitalisation. Pressure from patients has caused many techniques to spread rapidly before they have been adequately assessed. This must be resisted, and policy makers must pay more attention to minimally invasive surgery to ensure that good assessments are made. The widespread use of minimally invasive techniques has important implications for hospitals and health workers. As more patients are treated on an outpatient basis, fewer hospital beds will be needed, and traditional operating rooms will have to adapt to a greater turnover of patients. Surgeons will have to acquire new operating skills, possibly requiring formal training and accreditation, and, as different specialties fight for control of new technologies, surgery may eventually be merged with internal medicine so that specialists will deal with organ systems. Postoperative care will have to be carried out in the community rather than in hospitals, and policy makers will need to reorganise their health systems to cope with these developments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8274927      PMCID: PMC1679562          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.307.6918.1546

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  13 in total

Review 1.  The role of laparoscopy in the treatment of endometriosis.

Authors:  A S Cook; J A Rock
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Coelioscopic cholecystectomy. Preliminary report of 36 cases.

Authors:  F Dubois; P Icard; G Berthelot; H Levard
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1990-01       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 3.  A blueprint for day surgery.

Authors:  J M Burn
Journal:  Anaesthesia       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.955

4.  A comparison between arthroscopic meniscectomy and modified open meniscectomy. A prospective randomised study with emphasis on postoperative rehabilitation.

Authors:  P Hamberg; J Gillquist; J Lysholm
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1984-03

5.  Long-term results of arthroscopic partial meniscectomy.

Authors:  M D Northmore-Ball; D J Dandy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  [Pelviscopic ovarian surgery. Possibilities and limitations].

Authors:  E N Tavmergen; H Mecke; K Semm
Journal:  Zentralbl Gynakol       Date:  1990

7.  Outpatient laparoscopic laser cholecystectomy.

Authors:  E J Reddick; D O Olsen
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 2.565

8.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  T R Gadacz; M A Talamini; K D Lillemoe; C J Yeo
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.741

9.  Comparison of open and endoscopic meniscectomy.

Authors:  R Bergström; P Hamberg; J Lysholm; J Gillquist
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1984-04       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Value of diagnostic laparoscopy in young women with possible appendicitis.

Authors:  C M Whitworth; P W Whitworth; J Sanfillipo; H C Polk
Journal:  Surg Gynecol Obstet       Date:  1988-09
View more
  2 in total

1.  Minimally invasive surgery. Increases the cost of treatment.

Authors:  P M Cuckow
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-29

2.  An instrument assessing patient satisfaction with day care in hospitals.

Authors:  Sm Kleefstra; Rb Kool; Lc Zandbelt; Jcjm de Haes
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 2.655

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.