Literature DB >> 8273958

The effect of spinal immobilization on healthy volunteers.

D Chan1, R Goldberg, A Tascone, S Harmon, L Chan.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of standard spinal immobilization on a group of healthy volunteers with respect to induced pain and discomfort.
DESIGN: Prospective study.
SETTING: University teaching hospital. TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-one healthy volunteers with no history of back disease.
INTERVENTIONS: Subjects were placed in standard backboard immobilization for a 30-minute period. Number and severity of immediate and delayed symptoms were determined.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: One hundred percent of subjects developed pain within the immediate observation period. Occipital headache and sacral, lumbar, and mandibular pain were the most frequent symptoms. Fifty-five percent of subjects graded their symptoms as moderate to severe. Twenty-nine percent of subjects developed additional symptoms over the next 48 hours.
CONCLUSION: Standard spinal immobilization may be a cause of pain in an otherwise healthy subject.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8273958     DOI: 10.1016/s0196-0644(94)70007-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  16 in total

1.  Comparison of a long spinal board and vacuum mattress for spinal immobilisation.

Authors:  M D Luscombe; J L Williams
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 2.740

2.  Cervical Spine Injury Risk Factors in Children With Blunt Trauma.

Authors:  Julie C Leonard; Lorin R Browne; Fahd A Ahmad; Hamilton Schwartz; Michael Wallendorf; Jeffrey R Leonard; E Brooke Lerner; Nathan Kuppermann
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 3.  Prehospital use of cervical collars in trauma patients: a critical review.

Authors:  Terje Sundstrøm; Helge Asbjørnsen; Samer Habiba; Geir Arne Sunde; Knut Wester
Journal:  J Neurotrauma       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 5.269

4.  A review of seven support surfaces with emphasis on their protection of the spinally injured.

Authors:  P W Main; M E Lovell
Journal:  J Accid Emerg Med       Date:  1996-01

5.  Removal of the Long Spine Board From Clinical Practice: A Historical Perspective.

Authors:  Francis X Feld
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2018-09-17       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 6.  On-scene treatment of spinal injuries in motor sports.

Authors:  M Kreinest; M Scholz; P Trafford
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-12-22       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 7.  The use of the spinal board after the pre-hospital phase of trauma management.

Authors:  D Vickery
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Cervical spine motion during extrication: a pilot study.

Authors:  Jeffery S Shafer; Rosanne S Naunheim
Journal:  West J Emerg Med       Date:  2009-05

9.  When should a cervical collar be used to treat neck pain?

Authors:  Stefan Muzin; Zacharia Isaac; Joseph Walker; Omar El Abd; Jennifer Baima
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2008-06

10.  A novel first aid stretcher for immobilization and transportation of spine injured patients.

Authors:  Yan-Sheng Liu; Ya-Ping Feng; Jia-Xin Xie; Zhuo-Jing Luo; Cai-Hong Shen; Fang Niu; Jian Zou; Shao-Feng Tang; Jiang Hao; Jia-Xiang Xu; Li-Ping Xiao; Xiao-Ming Xu; Hui Zhu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.