Literature DB >> 8273286

Anisotropies in the perception of stereoscopic surfaces: the role of orientation disparity.

R Cagenello1, B J Rogers.   

Abstract

We measured stereoscopic slant detection thresholds for surfaces slanting about a horizontal or a vertical axis. For random-dot covered surfaces, 1.25 deg of slant was required to detect slant about a horizontal axis, whereas 2.1 deg of slant was required to detect slant about a vertical axis. This anisotropy could be due to the fact that orientation disparities, which contain information about surface slant, are generally smaller for surfaces slanting about a vertical axis. To test this possibility, slant thresholds were measured for surfaces whose orientation disparity content was manipulated independently of the other slant information present. When the magnitude of orientation disparity was the same for surfaces slanting about a horizontal and a vertical axis, both surface orientations required about 1.5 deg of slant to be detected; thus the anisotropy became negligible. In contrast, when the orientation disparity content of a surface slanting about a vertical axis was zero, 3-4 deg of slant was required for detection; thus the anisotropy became larger. Under the conditions of these experiments, it appears that the visual system utilizes orientation disparities.

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8273286     DOI: 10.1016/0042-6989(93)90099-i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  8 in total

1.  Responses of macaque V1 neurons to binocular orientation differences.

Authors:  H Bridge; B G Cumming
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  The motion-induced contour revisited: Observations on 3-D structure and illusory contour formation in moving stimuli.

Authors:  Gennady Erlikhman; Mengzhu Fu; Michael D Dodd; Gideon P Caplovitz
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-01-02       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 3.  Disparity processing in primary visual cortex.

Authors:  Sid Henriksen; Seiji Tanabe; Bruce Cumming
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2016-06-19       Impact factor: 6.237

4.  Early dynamics of stereoscopic surface slant perception.

Authors:  Baptiste Caziot; Benjamin T Backus; Esther Lin
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Human stereovision without localized image features.

Authors:  P A Arndt; H A Mallot; H H Bülthoff
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  The Stereoscopic Anisotropy Develops During Childhood.

Authors:  Ignacio Serrano-Pedraza; William Herbert; Laura Villa-Laso; Michael Widdall; Kathleen Vancleef; Jenny C A Read
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Binocular combination of stimulus orientation.

Authors:  O Yehezkel; J Ding; A Sterkin; U Polat; D M Levi
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-11-16       Impact factor: 2.963

8.  Stereo slant discrimination of planar 3D surfaces: Frontoparallel versus planar matching.

Authors:  Can Oluk; Kathryn Bonnen; Johannes Burge; Lawrence K Cormack; Wilson S Geisler
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 2.004

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.